Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Grazing response- A "thorny" issue


Tony Croft aka hamadryad
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

whats really bothering you Tony?:confused1: the thorns are just something you can focus your rage on, tell uncle Stevie:laugh1:

 

lmao, just sick and tired of being ripped to ribbons by thorns!

 

really no need for them in a garden after all, and while were bitching about thorns, we should be allowed to use a product known as napalm to bomb cherries that have had roses planted in them 40 odd year ago, have become "unsightly" and now are in need of removal!:thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a tip for removing thorns from your flesh...

Diebetics will often use a special pin/needle to prick the finger prior to taking a blood test. These are available from chemists and such. They are ideal for removing the little blighters from your body. They can be put with a cap on it and then placed into your pocket, or wherever!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so what were suggesting is that the hormone responsible for apical dominance is the hormone generating extra thorns?

 

The apical bud produces Auxin which is transported around the tree to supress other growth from becoming overly dominant (the way that Auxin works through the tree helps form the final shape of the tree).

 

I am sure that this is connected to the growth of thorns from pruning cuts as the renewed strong and very tasty apical growth needs protecting from those pesky browsers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im aware of auxin, its role in tree form etc, but not sure its responsible for the extra thorn response, more likely this is put in action via hormones caused by damaged cambium, like in the growth response to stresses that cause a reaction to conform to the axiom

 

Sorry to be too simplistic - you are obviously right. I was suggesting that the loss of apical dominance, through pruning, browsing or other natural occurrences changes the natural harmony and equilibrium as prescribed by axiom and many other lesser known and poorly researched growth hormones. This imbalance, in plants that react strongly such as the Hawthorn, will result in rapid growth of all parts including thorns. Indeed their must be another 'trigger' to grow a thorn and one that can be isolated and removed as per thornless cultivars that still display strong apical dominance characteristics.

 

Thorns have and are part of the trees vascular system. I wonder if, because of this, various toxins and waste products are stored/dumped into the thorns to give them extra bite and greater chance of causing infection? What a wonderful evolutionary twist that would be!

 

Finally, we all see birds fly in and out of hedges at silly speeds - why do we never find dead impaled birds on thorns?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.