Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Ash - Daldinia concentrica - Cramp balls/King Alfreds Cakes


MaxJ
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thought I would post the outcome of this. After weeks of trying to get hold of the customer to no avail, I managed to on Friday. Turns out the council went mad at him for not undertaking the recommended work (within the time limit) to the tree due to the dangerous limb and told him that the contractors are coming in 3 days to do it. They ended up felling it and another one further up the field of similar size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Presumably works under Miscellaneous Act...It doesn't ring true does it? One minute the LPA recommends a reduction (perhaps against better judgement and certainly not with liability as mentioned above ) but nevertheless, a reduction only to then throw their toys outta the pram and see to it the tree is removed wholesale. Not very consistent management...IMO. I dunno..these LPA's are very patchy. Some good, others frankly appalling!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was told that a 40% reduction including the overhanging limb had to be done by the end of August. I then quoted the job and he coughed slightly as most customers do within this industry. He then asked whether it would be cheaper to fell it which I said no due tractors and winches being needed etc as well as the traffic mgt. I think he was holding off due to financial issues and was ignoring council letters threatening him that the forthcoming action was going to happen.

 

Im passing the site today so will get a photo of how the contactors left it (whether it was a flush cut or hedge height stump left).

Shame really as I was looking forward to the job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...dont beat yourself up over it Max.....the client shoulda seen it comin' and there's no telling some folk mate!

Im with Hama on this...poor management spec. The owner can't surely have known the tree woulda been removed not just reduced as per spec from what you've told us . At least he wont be looking repeated works however eh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.