Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Excellent excellent excellent!


TimberCutterDartmoor
 Share

Recommended Posts

Now it is fashionable to assume (a) that all motorists are evil and should be punished, and (b) motorists who exceed the speed limit are the most evil .

 

 

I'd go with that :thumbup:

 

You are correct about the 10% speedo thingy.

 

If you have sat nav it can show the variation in speedo reading quite dramatically if you transfer it from one vehicle to another.

 

My landrover is bang on with the tomtom whereas the landcruiser was 10% below what the sat nav read

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not so, I am afraid.

 

The 10% +3 threshold was one that ACPO (the Association of Chief Police Officers) decided was sensible simply to prevent police forces (sorry - they're "services" now not forces) from being overwhelmed with paperwork and prosecutions. If you book *everybody* who is even slightly over the limit the whole system will grind to a halt due to the sheer volume of speeding tickets. However it is not the law and it is not mandatory. Now it is fashionable to assume (a) that all motorists are evil and should be punished, and (b) motorists who exceed the speed limit are the most evil and should be treated like would-be murderers, many police "services" are choosing to ignore the ACPO guidelines and prosecute everyone.

 

The issue of speedometers is equally misunderstood. By law a speedo may be inaccurate by (if I recall correctly) no more than 10% but it must not under-read at all, so if for example it is reading 50mph you could actually be doing anything from 45mph to 50mph but not more than 50mph. However it is not cost effective to manufacture a speedo to these specs (i.e, making one that is guaranteed not to under-read) and most good modern speedos are approximately plus/minus 5%. They are therefore designed to over-read by 5%, since they will therefore be legal with the +/-5% accuracy on top of this - they will never under-read. In this way if you have a +/-5% speedo designed to over-read by 5%, when it shows 50mph you ought to be doing 47.5mph +/- 2.5mph which keeps everything legal.

 

Police traffic vehicles have calibrated speedos (expensive) which will probably be less than 1% variant from true.

 

The bottom line is that if you are even 1mph over the limit you could be done for speeding.

 

Thats pretty interesting Treewolf, had no idea it actually worked that way, will keep it in mind in the future thanks :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats pretty interesting Treewolf, had no idea it actually worked that way, will keep it in mind in the future thanks :thumbup:

 

Glad to be of service!

 

Many times I have learned really useful stuff from this forum, and I am glad that for once I can give something back!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.