Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

MikePepler

Member
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MikePepler

  1. I wonder if Husqvarna will produce a new version of theirs too? I got a 536LiXP about a year and a half ago, picking that because it had a higher chain speed (20 m/s) and cheaper batteries than the equivalent Stihl, but this new Stihl is 24 m/s chain speed and also a full-chisel chain.
  2. Thanks for reading, I don't get much time to post on it at the moment... Yes, used the battery husky for 99% of the coppicing last winter. Slower than the petrol but quieter and no exhaust fumes to inhale! ?
  3. Certainly, feel free to start one and tag me in it. ?
  4. Sorry, all motors have windings (or coils). It's the flow of current through these that generates the fluctuating magnetic fields that 'push' against the fixed fields of the permanent magnets in a brushless motor. The electronics are to sense the rotor position, back emf, etc. and switch the current in the windings to make the rotor spin. If you're sure you've found something different, please post a link to some technical details. Just saying it exists isn't enough I'm afraid.
  5. As far as I'm aware, 'digital motor' is a marketing term invented by Dyson. All brushless motors are electronically controlled. There's a good explanation here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brushless_DC_electric_motor On the other points, unless a motor uses superconducters (which require liquid nitrogen cooling) then they will never be 100% efficient, and the losses will be through heat due to resistance in the windings. When I'm not in the woods my day job is in renewable energy, and I previously worked in electronic engineering, so I do have some experience in this.
  6. OK, but even if that's the case, 100% efficient is still only 10% more than with current motors. Then after that you need more juice from the battery to get more power.
  7. Sure, but if efficiency is already 90%, there's not much room left for improvement - you can never quite get to 100%, as some of power is always lost as heat in the motor windings. I'd expect the main improvements to be around making the motors smaller and lighter. I think we'll be waiting a while anyway, husqvarna have updated their saw already but it doesn't look much different...
  8. Well, brushless DC motors are already 80-90% efficient, so while there's some room for improvement you're still going to need better batteries (in terms of kWh capacity, discharge current, weight, and volume) to get more kW of power delivered to the chain. But there's improvements every year, and I assume the manufacturers could put better cells into the existing battery casings so they'd be compatible with existing chainsaws.
  9. You need a better battery too, to provide the capacity for a more powerful motor.
  10. Depends on the value you put on not breathing in carbon monoxide, particulates and unburned petrol ? But I agree, there is still some way to go before battery saws can do all the jobs required.
  11. My view is that charging time isn't too important, it's the cost. I can't charge a battery in the woods anyway, so have two, then charge them at my leisure at home. But you then end up spending quite a bit on batteries. Maybe if there's ever a reasonably priced electric 4x4 then charging from it in the woods might be feasible. Charging from an inverter on a petrol/diesel engine would be very inefficient.
  12. Yes, I think so. Tesla cars are already faster than any petrol car for the same money, and are coming down in price. I've driven a BMW i3, and the experience is great. E-bikes are potentially even better though, you feel like you have bionic legs! I had an early model 10 years ago, would like to buy one again soon... All these developments should fed through to the chainsaws - e-bikes are quite similar in terms of batteries and motors. I guess the chainsaw manufacturers might take a while to do new models though, I guess they'll want to earn some cash from the existing designs first. For the chainsaw, the only points that annoy me are the lower power (I'd rate it equivalent to a 30cc saw) and the low-profile chain/bar they sell it with. But for me these are outweighed by the plus sides most of the time. I realise this thread has gone quite some way off the original topic! ?
  13. I coppiced about 40m3 (stacked volume) using the battery saw this winter, and it stood up to that OK. I do look forward to the day when they can get a bit more power out of them though. I think the limitation at the moment is the battery - there are plenty of compact electric motors that can deliver several kW, but they'd drain the battery too fast and reduce its cycle life too. Maybe the battery tech will move on over the next few years, seeing as the electric car sector is growing so fast.
  14. Yeah, you can't see the curvature in the tree there, and there wasn't much in this one. Anyway, I made the video to show a battery saw felling a tree, rather than as a tree felling demo. Battery life has been very good actually, I've got two 9Ah batteries, and not yet managed to empty them both while coppicing, though that's allowing for time spent splitting and stacking wood, moving brash, etc. Logging is probably a better test, and I've found filling a 1m3 trailer uses about 3/4 of a battery - sometimes more, sometimes less, depending on log length and how hard the wood is.
  15. I know it's best to cut as low as possible, but I find the curvature and thickening at the base of chestnut stems annoying when I'm processing them later for firewood (which is what most of the wood is used for, and I use a Truncator for processing), so I tend to cut a little bit higher and leave the chog behind. Is there any reason not to? Happy to improve my knowledge if so. I stopped having fires about 10 years ago, saves time and avoids breathing in lots of smoke and killing the seeds in the ground where the fire would have been. I've seen wrens, robins and mice making good use of the brash piles I've left instead.
  16. You mean the lump off the bottom of the stem? I leave them in the woods to rot for biodiversity benefits.
  17. Hardly! ? But as you mention it, here's a video to show why I ended up with a spare 346xp in first place. Battery saws won't be for everyone or every situation, and I still have a working 346xp and 570 as well, but the electric one has done well enough over this winter that I felt I no longer needed two 346xp's:
  18. Thanks Bill, and @Stubby, I've emailed @spudulike to ask for some details. I've got the newer model, with the silver side. I guess if I decide to send it to Spud for porting he may be able to advise on the pot.
  19. Yeah, I gathered they are popular saws, and I've certainly enjoyed using them over the years. Roughly what does a port and rebuild cost, and what are the benefits in use?
  20. Thanks Bill, that's very helpful! A thorough clean is certainly needed, or it would be trashed again the first time I fired it up. The pot is visually OK, but it would make sense to replace it at the same time as the piston. Is there a good place in the UK to buy the Meteor kit if I go down that route? Most of the stuff on ebay is other brands, with the Meteor stuff coming from the USA. There also seems to be a range of cylinder bores available...
  21. Done! I've been using a battery chainsaw (536LiXP) for nearly a year now, alongside a couple of petrol ones, and it's been doing a great job.
  22. Hi All, I've been lurking here for a long time, reading interesting discussions. However, I've got a question I'd be interested in people's views on. I've got a couple of 346XP (newer version) chainsaws, one bought in 2007 and the other in 2009. Having recently bought a 536LiXP, I decided to sell the older 346XP to a friend who was just starting in forestry. But, 6 weeks later it stopped dead while he was cleaning up a tree stump, and the engine wouldn't turn over. My assumption was not enough mixing oil, but we took it apart last night and found the piston had broken (see attached images), with no sign of overheating damage to piston or cylinder. So... I'm refunding him his money, as I sold it thinking it was working but promised that if it died in the near future I'd pay him back. And now I'm not sure what to do from the following options: 1. Have a go at repairing it myself. Problem here is I don't really need it (which is why I'd sold it) - I have a working 346XP, a larger petrol saw too and am trying to use the electric one as much as possible. 2. Keep it for spares for my other 346XP. But then I may not use any of the parts for years... 3. Sell it as it is for someone to repair or use for parts. It was in working order in all other respects. 4. Sell parts from it on ebay. (more money that option 3, but a lot more work) Any thoughts greatly appreciated! Thanks, Mike

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.