JAG63

Depends on the work, I use a throwline most days.

I had the impression during the feature that it was linked to a general recommendation for the home as well. To be fair, it's just the balance of O2 and CO2 that changes overnight with CO2 output no longer being offset and exceeded by O2 output.

Until it reverses overnight and they pump out CO2 instead. That's why plants used to be removed from hospital wards overnight.

I'd always use the premium grade fuel or Aspen equivalent before so no difference as it's only the standard that's changing for now. 

2 hours ago, JSN said:

The types of qualifications to look out for are ND, level 4, HND, level 6, BSc, MSc, or, Lantra PTI, in arboriculture. Could also check for professional membership of Arboriculture Association or Chartered Institute of Foresters.  
More  important to check that chosen expert has professional indemnity insurance to cover giving the advice you require. 

Both AA and ICF list members by area.  

I think JSN posted that 2 hours ago

8 hours ago, woody paul said:

Second hand pto chippers swam to be thin on the ground at the moment. 

 John Mason has a couple, can't give an opinion on suitability for you.

Zig zag for me. Two work really well for single hand control of two lines when needed, much better than any other combination I've tried. I tend to want two hands on lockjack for steady control and find spiderjack a bit bulky though the same could be said about the new zig zag.

Can only find the hard copy for sale on the AA site , don't know if an electronic copy is available.

Re kit, check with the training provider. Some will provide for an additional fee. If you choose to takr your own make sure you have all the relevant LOLER documentation with you. I would see if you can hire from the training provider to start with, no point in buying blind or worse finding it's not for you once you've splashed out a large chunk of hard earned on kit.

For preparation I'd say practice Blake's hitch, VT and probably Distel, maintain fitness and have a look through Tech Guide 1.

I heard it's the council, a quick serch turns up a couple of posts but I haven't really dug deeper. Could also look at Sheffield Tree Care or one of the Huddersfield firms, don't know if they've got vacancies though.

If you're north end I think Wakefield are recruiting, might be viable. 

Congratulations, welcome to arb.

I'm on a rope guide, can't fault it.

My understanding of the published Tech Guide 1 is it's the connection to the bridge that's the difference, independent connections are OK whilst single connections are not. So two anchors to a zigzag connected to the bridge by a crab is non compliant whilst a swivel directly on the bridge (becoming part of it like a ring would) with two anchors attached is compliant. Presumably a swivel attached to the bridge by a crab and then to two anchors would be non compliant whilst a zigzag directly on the bridge and then to two anchors would be compliant. 

Sect 6 page 32

Sect 14 page 88

Worked with Sheffield Tree Care a few times and been impressed, also know a quality climber who has recently moved to them.

9 hours ago, TIMON said:

Looks like a great combo/customisation.
Not sure how the ‘two rope’ regs take into account two systems off a single bridge. (Anyone?) I suppose it all comes down to whether the bridge is considered part of the harness or part of the system. In the event of the bridge failing, the ‘back up’ system would be useless.
I’m not sure if this was given any consideration when the ‘regs’ were changed.
 

Tech Guide 1 p14, 14.7.5, 14.7.7 and associated photos 14.7.7 suggest that it is compliant as long as it's directly on the bridge, effectively becoming part of the bridge, rather than connected by a crab. P6 photo 6.6c (bottom) shows a zigzag being used with two systems as incorrect connection via a single connection, the only difference I can see is a crab is used to connect the zigzag to a swivel rather than being directly on the bridge. 

Video killed the radio star - Buggles

I lost my heart to a star ship trooper - no idea, hated it

deep purple, blondie, wings, average white band, the damned

the monkeys

Could try Spenborough 

Spenborough Engineering Ltd | Specialists in Tippers and Tipper Bodies

WWW.TIPPERBODIES.COM

---

Spenborough engineering Ltd is a independent company specialising in Commercial Vehicle Bodybuilding, Tippers, Tipper Bodies, Drop Side Tippers and more.

Where could it go wrong?

. turning up without current LOLER certification for equipment, assuming you're using your own/employer kit.

Assessment: Usually the stupid things, it's not a race:

. forgetting the theory H&S questions, or rather answers to them.

. not achieving a safe and stable work position prior to cutting.

. dropping something on another student/assessor/kit.

. one handed cutting with a chainsaw.

Assessors are usually on your side as long as you're safe.

I got a pair of Chatsworth from RockFall in Alfreton when I first started. Comfortable straight out of the box and easily reproofed, not a climbing boot though.

Andrews soles usually last about a year before becoming slicks with me. Uppers start to fall apart (eyelets and rand peeling away in flex areas) within a couple of months, particularly the latest pair. They're also a very snug fit with constant pressure on the side of a toe but then that's not unusual for me.

Belated happy New Year all.

Been on the TM for the last 3 years and really like it but tried a Petzl Sequoia this week. Much better in some aspects, no stupidly vulnerable elastic cord at the back, much lighter, decent gear loops and seems to be easier moving through restricted crotches. Has the option of an adjustable bridge as well, ideal for those of us in their 6th decade. On the downside I used the leg Ds more than the side Ds on the TM, might have been adjustment but the Sequoia leg Ds just didn't work for me.

I'll probably go with the Sequoia for my next harness given price and adjustable bridge option. It's also much closer to the rock harnesses I'm used to, particularly the SRT version.