Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

shaggy

Member
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by shaggy

  1. personally I would have liked the axles a bit further forward but it hasn't been a problem. If I get a chance I may move them foward. The crane is a 3 point linkage one so comes off fairly easily and I have loading ramps stowed away under the trailer so yes ideal for moving a 5 tone digger!

  2. What kind of grunt does your u140 have and what is the dimensions and weight of your trailer? Looks well mate :thumbup1:

     

    It pulls well drives fully loaded with the chipper on the back not much different to empty. With the trailer on and fully loaded you aren't going any when quickly but you wouldn't want to.

     

    The trailer as far as I know was built to be towed by a mog it has air brakes all round personally I would have liked the axles a bit further forward but it hasn't been a problem. it's plated at 10500kg the tipping body is 4.2m long by 1.95m wide so follows the mog well.

  3. I like the idea of being able to stack them out side and cut them to order, ideal if you have limited covered storage.

     

    Out of interest how long does it take to split 1 cubic meter of billets and how long does it take to run them through a crosscut with elevator?

  4. I have been asked to price removing a mature oak tree for a local parish council. Due to a subsidence claim from neighbouring property.

     

    The tree stands on the side of a small track accessing a piece of ground behind a row of houses. Either side of the track are 2 houses approximately 5-10m away

     

    The tree is situated on the left hand boundary of the track. The house on the right hand side of the track (the house which is furthest away of the two) has made a subsidence claim backed up by a report that this oak tree is casing subsidence to their house, and therefore their insurance company want the tree to be removed.

     

    The houses were built well after the tree was there and are built on shrinkable clay. In my view if the tree was to be removed they will be opening them selves up to a subsidence claim from the house on the left which is closer to the tree than the house on the right.

     

    In my eyes the house with the claim should be looking at other options such as underpinning rather than removing the tree.

     

    The parish council have also asked whether a staged removal would get round these problems. The way I see it is that it will have the same affect but just take longer to show the damage.

     

    I am no expert on the subject, the above is an educated guess I would be interested to hear other peoples views.

     

    Thanks

     

    Ben

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.