Dagmar said "Surely this is a case of the removal of a post(s) that contain unsubstantiated allegations that are quite serious, as such it should be removed as the allegations cast serious doubts about the integrety of an individual."
Well you should be aware that my post from the now removed thread said this.....
"Mr Bashford, I find myself in the unusual position of supporting you in a sense because I do not believe that Mr Burgess resigned simply because you misled the BoD of the ISA UK+I Chapter (and in doing so cost the Chapter approx £3000).
I am of the opinion that a more significant factor in his decision was the way that most of the ISA UK+I Board of Directors apparently accepted being misled (and the costs associated with that), and did nothing (beyond extracting an apology), to censure or otherwise reprimand you.
If you succeed in becoming ISA President now the votes are in, you will, in my opinion, have made yourself the New Statesman of Arboriculture, however you will have done so without the benefit of my vote."
Please understand that I posted that specifically because Mr Bashford suggested that Mr Burgess's post was slanderous but then failed to offer any insights to justify that allegation.
Now you all get to decide if you think some things that some may not want to discuss are actually worth talking through.
This IS a private forum and the owner and moderators can remove anything that they don't want to see aired. But for those who always want to focus on positives (that certainly do litter this forum and make it so popular), to the exclusion of all else, you might be missing part of the picture. Remember, you can apply personal censorship because you don't actually have to read the thread.