Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

HI it is substantialy cheaper than its big brother, i have used the lite, is good but not as good as the picus tom, i can see it being great for aerial use... For anyone thinking of buying a picus in any form would suggest saving your money and buying a nylon hammer and going on mike ellison's course - once you get an ear for the sound you can compete with the picus.......:)

Posted
HI it is substantialy cheaper than its big brother, i have used the lite, is good but not as good as the picus tom, i can see it being great for aerial use... For anyone thinking of buying a picus in any form would suggest saving your money and buying a nylon hammer and going on mike ellison's course - once you get an ear for the sound you can compete with the picus.......:)

 

Si...mucho greaso the ol palmo for an interpretation that is as wild as mild oftentimes...all good fun but wouldnt want to spend on this one personally.....:drunk:

Posted
HI it is substantialy cheaper than its big brother, i have used the lite, is good but not as good as the picus tom, i can see it being great for aerial use... For anyone thinking of buying a picus in any form would suggest saving your money and buying a nylon hammer and going on mike ellison's course - once you get an ear for the sound you can compete with the picus.......:)

 

I've always appreciated the simplicity and effectiveness of the hammer! The idea is for a belt and braces approach to disputed trees though, so the LITE would add, not replace, to our arsenal!

 

Does it take much more time to setup and use than the ful fat picus?

Posted
I've always appreciated the simplicity and effectiveness of the hammer! The idea is for a belt and braces approach to disputed trees though, so the LITE would add, not replace, to our arsenal!

 

Does it take much more time to setup and use than the ful fat picus?

 

Takes less time than the full fat picus but the results are not as conclusive. The picus is great when showing non arbs the severity of decay, if thats what you need to prove a case to sceptics and back up your decisions then the picus is what you want, if you want to do trees over DBH 36 then you need the full fat picus as the lite isnt very accurate on larger trees.

Posted
what do you guys think of the Resistograph?

 

I know the bore holes are tiny but do you seal them with silicone sealant to prevent any further ingress of pathogen

Posted
I know the bore holes are tiny but do you seal them with silicone sealant to prevent any further ingress of pathogen

 

i'll hold my hands up and say no, infact i've never thought about it, think i'll investigate further..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.