Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Harvester head for 8 tonne excavator


Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

On an 8 tonner, a roller head is going to eat every fluid ounce of hydraulic flow you've got. What are you cutting in the main? Hard or softwood?

 

Keto 51 is probably going to be most numerous head available to find second hand. Not a great fan of Keto myself, only because they can't compete with a mainstream head from the main manufacturers.

 

There is a very small Logmax fitted to an 8 tonner which I am told made an appearance at the APF show.

 

Off the top of my head you've got Logset, Viking, Keto, SP, Waratah(JD), Logmax, Komatsu*, Ponsse, AFM, FMS Stroke head, Kesla easily available. 

 

Logmax makes the best case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All sorts, hardwood and softwood. Mostly small woodlands, but we will be using the harvester mostly on 1st-2nd thinnings. From a bit of research the main options for small machines seem to be keto, Nisula, Kesla, Jobo combi. Only the jobo combi is affordable new for us, but it's a roller assisted stroke harvester and atm I'm not yet 100% convinced of the suitability/productivity of that setup. Otherwise the others are too pricey to justify for us and I've not spotted any secondhand options. The main reason for choosing an excavator is that we farm as well as forestry so an excavator would be a very handy piece of machinery and can't currently justify a purpose built!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does that put an X in the price box then? 😂 I do like the Tapio but at 35k it doesn't seem productive enough. The Jobo came in at 25k and has the roller assist which should increase the output. Or it adds a layer of electrical complexity to an otherwise simple piece of equipment... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GeoF said:

Does that put an X in the price box then? 😂 I do like the Tapio but at 35k it doesn't seem productive enough. The Jobo came in at 25k and has the roller assist which should increase the output. Or it adds a layer of electrical complexity to an otherwise simple piece of equipment... 

Compared with moter manual,  a stroke head is productive.  A head like these needs years of identical trees to make any money,  and i don't get that in west Wales.  If i was to go mechanised then it would be a 14 tonner and suitable head.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, slack ma girdle said:

Compared with moter manual,  a stroke head is productive.  A head like these needs years of identical trees to make any money,  and i don't get that in west Wales.  If i was to go mechanised then it would be a 14 tonner and suitable head.

I think FMS would be your best ally in that scenario 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.