Food for thought

[slack ma girdle]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=li6AYguTrs8

[Macpherson]

18 hours ago, slack ma girdle said:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=li6AYguTrs8

 

Interesting to have the simple maths of tree planting and the limitations laid bare, although I think that using territorial emissions for the UK and linking them to a steady decrease in Co2 over the last few decades can't be a true indication of much.

 

Our industrial past may have been substantially diminished but we consume more than ever, so while on paper we may look to be improving our dirty business is just being done elsewhere and where we have no control of industrial practices or emissions.

 

I find it hard to be objective on this subject { amongst others } as I suspect the whole picture is skewed by the interests of the very large and shouty climate change industry which is worth trillions and is probably unstoppable whether right or wrong.

 

Also I've read a good bit on this and many would claim that the climate figures used by the IPCC, much of which are supplied by NASA are exaggerated to back up their story and don't match up with other ' ignored ' scientists findings...

Where else have we heard a similar story recently ?.. another unelected anonymous global mouthpiece the WHO.

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm not in denial of the fact that as a species we're trashing the planet, but I just smell a rat when there's money to be made.

The climate has always varied and will continue to do so regardless of mans activities.

 

Cheers