Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

bracing weak forks- inspired!


Tony Croft aka hamadryad
 Share

Recommended Posts

If the concern (which led JFL to suggest these compound bracing options) was to reduce the likelihood of creating an un-natural fulcrum along the lever arm that the limb represents then I wonder why the existing dynamic cabling systems are not seen as adequate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

:biggrin: Yes, they write good specs those Germans eh:sneaky2:

 

If you get the opportunity try to get hold of the German standard or BMP (not really sure what they call it:blushing:) relating to dynamic cable bracing... when I used to get paid to climb and do such things had the chance on a number of occaisions to work for a chap who was familiar with dynamic cabling specs.

 

In fact the last few commercial climbs I did were to install fall arrest/redirect systems into tree canopies something I really think should be utilised far more especially when confronted with veteran trees and high occupancy targets that cannot (or will not) be altered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:biggrin: Yes, they write good specs those Germans eh:sneaky2:

 

If you get the opportunity try to get hold of the German standard or BMP (not really sure what they call it:blushing:) relating to dynamic cable bracing... when I used to get paid to climb and do such things had the chance on a number of occaisions to work for a chap who was familiar with dynamic cabling specs.

 

In fact the last few commercial climbs I did were to install fall arrest/redirect systems into tree canopies something I really think should be utilised far more especially when confronted with veteran trees and high occupancy targets that cannot (or will not) be altered.

 

Are you consulting sean? you certainly know your bunions! good post, never really thought about cables as a means to redirect a failure, is that what you meant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it assuming some degree of flex between the two points on the limb. Upper one goes out pulling lower one in? Initial flex increased but whole limb more controlled?:confused1:

 

Yep. The closer the two attachment points on the target limb the less of a moment is generated around the pivot for a given force.

 

However, is this a good way for a limb to be moving? I don't think so. With a well spread out system (which I presume was the intention) the forces generated at point C could lead to failure. Which, I'd suggest, is not the point of bracing the tree...

Capture.jpg.9a4be41b55c325e379c4e8527913ca5a.jpg

Edited by Amelanchier
punctuation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is of course presuming conventional textile bracing cordage without shockabsorbers. Stick some stretch in the system and it might be a runner...

 

Edit: Nah changed my mind, - even with shockabsorbers to reduce peak loads and an average 10% cordage stretch, it's still a bad idea.

Edited by Amelanchier
in post
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony I had the same thought when I saw the Z-brace - there's no space for movement in the system so what is the point of the pulleys? Potentially worse than useless in that it could be overly restrictive of movement.

 

The others look quite interesting though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you consulting sean? you certainly know your bunions! good post, never really thought about cables as a means to redirect a failure, is that what you meant?

 

Thanks Hama, yes consulting is what I do for a dedicated company based in SE Qld in a suburb called Miami (which might seem weird except when you see the kind of canal estates that have totally destroyed the original ecosystem that was here before!)

 

Redirect is as you rightly deduced, intended to in the event of catastrophic failure catch and pull the (usually vry large) limb into a preferred area....normally against the stem.

 

I have attached some vry poor pics (sorry I was not there to inspect the system) of a redirect installed to manage the potential failure in half of a large veteran Lophostemon confertus. The tree has two co-dominant leaders frowming a very attractive rounded canopy but has a massive fire injury through almost 30% of the stem under one of the leaders and a visble crack extending up through the union. From memory it has twin 8 Ton Cobra linking the weakened half to the structurally sound half.

 

DSCF2947rs.JPG.1c418ff32512285b8e510bad4b805745.JPG

 

DSCF2946rs.JPG.11333fb2fce6016aa15d3c2ecb392e30.JPG

 

DSCF2950rs.JPG.c45d2b9caf9ece777552877a10d5dc3c.JPG

 

DSCF2951rs.JPG.dba3cd05a08d7888382e2b68380d0187.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.