Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Installing childrens' play equipment BSEN 1176 / 77


kevinjohnsonmbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just starting to look at this, not yet done deep research but wondering if anyone has covered this territory already:

 

I'm seeing quite a few new or replacement installations of children's play areas where it appears blatantly obvious that no consideration has been given to 5837 in regard to digging / landscaping within RPAs, nor the any thought given to future implications of potential hazards associated with drawing, and holding, occupants into potential risk areas if trees become dysfunctional or defective in the future.

 

The installation can cause damage to tree roots and the installers (and new owners) appear oblivious to the potential to encumber the owner with a responsibility for inspection / assessment of existing trees where the human use of the potential hazard area is significantly changed.

 

It appears to be an area that may, or may not, require planning consent, depending upon the size / scale of the installation, the proximity to neighbours, the designation of the existing land mass etc. Doesn't appear to be a clear answer (although Mumsnet did give some opinions!)

 

BSEN 1176 / 1177 (overview here: http://www.wicksteed.co.uk/pdfs/EN1176%20and%20EN1177.pdf) provides the design, installation and maintenance schemes for the play equipment, but, and only based on a quick scan, appears not to link in any way to 5837.

 

Should the standards link to each other? Should we expect anyone other than those quoting standards to actually read them? Would more people read them if they weren't so expensive?

 

Is anyone looking / thinking / seeing a similar situation and starting to look at the details?

 

More to follow when I stop typing this as an excuse to avoid what I should actually be doing tonight!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Here's one of the worst examples I've seen.

 

The Chairman of the PC was horrified to be informed that the tit with the wheel digger that took the bank out could have compromised the trees. He was super keen to explore the possibility of recovering the costs of damage / remediation from the contractor.....

 

Until it came to light that the landscaper was the husband of a parish councillor who'd been given the job as a bung!

 

Then it all went rather quiet......

IMGP2664.jpg.83aa7f0e21dbbd49ee4ec7e6604fa693.jpg

IMGP2665.jpg.34fca7d9b1476a6295ed9dcb071229d6.jpg

IMGP2656.jpg.e480e510fad019fc4f18946ed8cfaea9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.