TPO being removed

[daltontrees]

If I'm looking at the right tree, the Council's arb view is this.

"Advice from landscape and arboriculture officers on the issues raised is as follows.

The judgement of officers is that the tree is of high amenity and aesthetic value and makes a positive contribution to the character of the area. This is of benefit to both residents and visitors.

The tree is a cultivar of Lawson’s Cypress, a tree with a large number of cultivars from forest trees to dwarf trees which vary in their life expectancy. This tree is estimated to be around 90 to 100 years old with a substantial remaining safe useful life expectancy."

 

Should be a refusal. But then again these things are never certain.

[mickdundee]

If I'm looking at the right tree, the Council's arb view is this.

 

"Advice from landscape and arboriculture officers on the issues raised is as follows.

 

The judgement of officers is that the tree is of high amenity and aesthetic value and makes a positive contribution to the character of the area. This is of benefit to both residents and visitors.

 

The tree is a cultivar of Lawson’s Cypress, a tree with a large number of cultivars from forest trees to dwarf trees which vary in their life expectancy. This tree is estimated to be around 90 to 100 years old with a substantial remaining safe useful life expectancy."

 

 

 

Should be a refusal. But then again these things are never certain.

 

 

 

Thank you for finding that

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk