Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

crotchgrabber

Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

crotchgrabber's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

  1. lovely info packed a=reply there. May I ask where Beal Access rope is less than £1?
  2. I think yes but no, because working at heights on stuff like oil rigs, bridges, concerts, wind turbines, theatre, military, rescue and even window cleaning are all industries which demand the use of EN1891 rope, which is semi static and sharing pretty much all the same properties as arborist climbing line. The only things I can gather "work positioning" type ropes lack is bright colours and prioritising knottability. The ropes are almost always white, and in the case of military and theatre - they are pure black, Ironically a lot of these "working at height" type jobs would probably be better suited to dynamic rope. Those at risk of falling have to use a fall arrest/shock absorbing device , where with a dynamic rope they wouldnt need to.
  3. Hello everyone, I am a green beginner and this is my first post so go easy on me if this is a subject that has been discussed to death or is so obvious it doesn't need explanation. I have done a search but only found one thread that seemed to touch on it slightly, which was someone asking whether some LSK rope they found on ebay was legit. I am just gearing up (just for recreational and hobby purposes for forseeable time) and the bit of gear that has been left till last has been the most important, the climbing line. Because it is somewhat confusing what types of rope is suitable, and because anything labelled / marketed for Arb use costs at least twice as much as seemingly identical but less excitingly coloured alternatives. Would anyone care to share experiences and information about the use of non arb line as arb climbing line and how well or badly they functioned for the purpose? From the information I have seen, it seems that all these varieties of rope have a similar construction braided polyester, nylon or polypropelene with dyneema or aramid cores available in marine rope. Arb specific rope seems to prefer lower strand numbers (for durability?) , half inch diameter for traditional blakes hitch climbing and 10mm-12mm for SRT with devices. Every explanation of why only Arb specific climbing line is suitable for trees (compared to other semi-static ropes) is that they hold arborist knots while others (caving, marine etc) do not. But the manufacturers descriptions of most modern semi static rope offerings from safety equipment fields and especially rock climbing companies like Edelrid, Petzl, Tendon, Beal etc.. emphasise "Excellent knottability". Are they lying? Is excellent knottability in mountaineering terms actually piss poor in arborist terms?

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.