Derek Eames
-
Posts
83 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Calendar
Freelancers directory
Posts posted by Derek Eames
-
-
-
To All Arbs
Just had confirmation from the local tree officer that as there are no TPO or CA constraints and the tree is classified as potentially dangerous then there is no restrictions for removing Good idea to check though as there may be differing opinions on this.!
- 1
-
Possibly Ganoderma resinaceum. Flesh colour would seem to confirm this as well as being common on Oaks. Saprotrophic.
- 1
-
Thanks Julian
Appreciate your comments. The QTRA assessment is at 1/4K which is not tolerable when imposed on others. However I have since discovered (previously hidden by Ivy) evidence of sapwood fracture beginning to the NE elevation. The client has accepted that the tree needs to be removed but just not sure about the planning implication. If we have to wait for planning then it will probably be Nov 22 before we can do anything!!!!
-
I have a tree within a planning application for building works which is a large leaning Beech which is split and hollow right through from east to west elevation. There is no TPO or Conservation Area constraints but would be in principal protected by the planning application. Would any one be able to advise on this and whether it could be taken down without waiting for planning? MT.
-
Yes. A truly beautiful fungi.
-
Probably most are endophytic. Refer to the Casebook of Dr Duncan Slater
-
-
-
-
-
Excellent suggestions! Many thanks. Not too sure about Bolete but will certainly research further..!!!
-
-
This is very significant and very interesting. Do we have any law case precedent or principle to support? Many thanks.
-
Looks like Coprinellus sp, perhaps.
-
I think that you will find that anything above 2m constitutes a "nuisance" under law however others can confirm. Sorry if that is not what you want to hear.
-
Good Evening All
Interesting question. If trees on a property are protected by a TPO but the neighbouring property isn't does this mean that the neighbour may prune back to the property boundary without application?
-
OK Cornubia it is. Many thanks all...
-
MT. It does look like a Cotoneaster x suecicus but appreciate any further thoughts...
Sorry the x suecicus is only about 1m height max so no go...
Cornubia is a possibility though...
-
-
Curious that. The stump being white would indicate Sorbus sp. Not so sure about the Prunus as a lack of prominent lenticels or at least so it would appear! Any pics of buds?
-
Thanks Mick. I had wondered about Elm. How about Ulmus minor? Size and colour is about right...
Lot of leaf litter about including Oak and Maple...
-
-
Ash is ring porous. This is diffuse porous. Probably Maple..
Not quite sure about this one...!
in Tree Identification pictures
Posted
Thanks Dan