Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Piston Skirt

Member
  • Posts

    133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Piston Skirt

  1. Well I guess it's not viable if my bars won't fit, don't really want to have to buy new bars to fit it at £100/ bar.

    I'm wondering if I can just change the bar studs?

     

    Nope. The bar studs are fixed from the inside of oil tank. Technically it means it would take:

    a) custom machining of magnesium crankcase and then making the new bigger sized studs.

    b) making a couple spacers (internal dia. = stud dia., external dia. = bar slot width) which is effectively simplified version of bar adapter.

     

    Seems like it's better to check the oil hole position on your bar(s), measure the oiler slot position on the saw, check if Stihl-Husky adapter actually fits your bar(s) and (if YES)... get that adapter & saw & bars together :D

     

    EDIT: this adapter seems to have ALMOST everything right, except it would need some filing/milling in the middle - CS-501SX has additional screw head between the studs https://performanceoutdoorequipment.com/collections/chainsaw-bars-and-chains/products/cannon-cbw-20040-8mm-bar-adapter

  2. Yes, just measured - the mounting pins are 8mm, which makes the 8.2mm mount (C1) the most adequate :)

     

    Also, tensioner hole centers are 28.5mm apart. Minimum distance between the 2 holes is 21.5mm, maximum - 36mm.

     

    Actual tensioner axis offset from center of the bar is 13.5mm

     

    Let me know if this sounds hard to understand - I'll just make a couple pictures then.

  3. It uses the same 041 mount (OREGON) as CS-500 (the only difference is tensioner located in clutch cover).

    The rim is "small 7" which means it's 18720 for a 3/8 (OREGON)

     

    Sure, you can look up analogues from other manufacturers based on this info.

  4. Well, that same guy I mentioned was given a 620SX for evaluation. Obviously more power at the price of more weight. As he spends all day in the woods, he chose a smaller one - fully equipped it's couple kilos lighter - easier on your back and really nimble when cutting branches. Of course if you intend to work on bigger trees and spend most of the time bucking it - 620 will shave off some time :)

  5. Runs nice. Comparing to the older CS-500 it has a lot less vibrations on idle. Comparing to the CS-510 it has more power at any revs. My friend uses it daily in the forest since august 2015 - nothing wrong happened except usual forester scratches :) And yes, as usually it takes few tanks to unleash the full power - it's really noticeable.

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.