What is a tree?

[Meep]

Found this last night, makes quiet an interesting read.

090213-Palm%20Developments%20judgement.pdf

[[email protected]]

to much for one night 's reading

[Yorkshireman]

it basically covers woodland tpos & whether new growth within one, post the protection , should also be covered

 

42. As for the temporal reach of woodland orders, I see nothing illogical in tree preservation orders applying to future trees. The tree preservation order for the one tree, or for a group of trees, may be intended to apply to specific trees only, but a woodland order would seem designed to protect the undifferentiated mass of trees in the specified area

Edited May 13, 2009 by Yorkshireman

[Meep]

Gets you thinking thou, I always though if a TPO was severed in say 1979 you could do what you like to all trees 30 years and younger. As they wouldn’t be on the schedule.

 

Totally agree with you, how can you protect a tree to the criteria that justifies a TPO without it being there and or being approved for a TPO?