Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Njug 4


Woodcut33
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Can anyone tell my why NJUG 4 does not recommend using builders sand around roots when resurfacing?

 

Is it because of the possibility of contaminants (lime/salt) or because it has less pore space than sharp sand and would therefore defeat the object of creating an oxygenated layer beneath a compacted surface?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

I doubt salts are the problem - builders sand is 'washed' these days (has been for many years), and any builder worth his salt will know that salt in a mortar mix reduces its strength. The problem is likely to be be more to do with the fact that it's not free draining (as you say, small pore space), whereas sharp sand helps drainage. Sharp sand also helps to loosen up clay type soil, while builders sand will create a solid lump when mixed with clay soil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would a builder recommend builders sand when resurfacing? All the resurfacing works i have been involved in sharp sand was the only sand used as a base layer, Builders sand shifts and is prone to localised compaction so will not form a stable base, whereas sharp sand form a uniform stable base when compacted with a wacker plate. I also still think that the builders sand does wash out when wet, but not sure if this contains harmful salts that are detrimental to trees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just found some info on the Leicester gov web site Highways, transportation and development - Appendix F - Highway, Transportation And Development

 

You should take particular care when backfilling excavations within a tree protection zone. Tree roots are particularly affected when soil is compacted and they can also be damaged by the mechanical action of tamping down. Backfill material around exposed roots should consist of a fine granular material which provides a high proportion of air space. You should not use builders’ sand as it is toxic to tree roots. The material should be compacted using hand-tamping methods which maintain a degree of aeration and enable tree roots to survive.

 

I notice here that it mentions builders sand being toxic to tree roots - however I am convinced the problem is more due to lack of aeration and drainage, which will definitely be damaging, than it is to salt toxicity. I am now going to find out more wearing my scientist hat :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.