Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Would it be right to say, from impressions of that which is written in support of the software, that it too can be a bit vague?

Influenced by apptitude of interpretation of the circumstances in which it is being used? Or are tree root issues just inherently complex by vitrue of the unseen nature. Walls & other obstructions, whilst they make the root area's distribution irregular, can they be so simply drawn. Also, do you merge? You would need to be well informed to use it then?

It would need to be seen as reliable to be effective.

Otherwise it is another tool with which to argue and postulate, meanwhile, the bored digger driver thought it would be okay to .......

Posted
Would it be right to say, from impressions of that which is written in support of the software, that it too can be a bit vague?

They're just drawing tools - they don't make any descisions for you.

 

It's up to the person inputtng the information to decide whether or not an existing structure is likely to have formed a barrier to root growth.

 

In terms of accuracy it should be spot on - it only needs to deal with the simple formulas required by the BS. If you give a stem diameter of 500mm, then it will calculate a Root Protection Area of 113m2. If you give the wrong stem dia, then it will give you the wrong RPA.

Posted

I've had a bit of a play about with map maker and it seems fairly user friendly.

 

My main question would be can the information be saved in an autocad format? The demo only allows it to be saved as an image file.

Posted

Whilst we're on the topic of RPAs...

 

Anyone alter the shape of their RPAs to accomodate the environment??? I've done it in AutoCAD but its a pain in the arse. Do these programs offer the ability to reshape RPAs?

 

Does my head in when I recieve a Tree Constraints Plan with pretty RPA circles drawn through ring roads, buildings and sheer cliff faces... :(

Posted

bsexample.JPG

 

The above image is taken from the mapmaker site - it alters the shape of the RPA quite nicely, by extending the arc away from the barrier, whilst maintaining the overall area.

 

Notwithstanding the cliff comment, it's uncanny how regularly the RPA is similar to the canopy spread - as in the old rule of thumb for positioning protective fencing.

Posted
Thereby self drawing an rpa effectively... ( because it maintains an area ( m2 ) with no basis in reality) ??

 

Surely it's more realistic than showing the RPA going through the barrier?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.