Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Fungus ID


RPA
 Share

Recommended Posts

First sorry about the quality of the photos - camera.

 

Asked to do a reduction on this last week. When I got there I noticed a big dif in leaf colour from one side of the tree to the other (multi stemed) but have seen this before this year. On closer inspection old pruning cuts (poor stub cuts) had produced dramatic regrowth and then the branches had died back. Looking round the base of the tree I found several fungus app the size of a 2p and golf ball shaped within 18" of the base of the tree, and to finish things of I couldnt id the bloody thing:015:

I took some branch and fungus samples to an assessor who owed me a favour. He thinks the fungus is feeding on the decay rather than causing it. He also (eventually - so that made me feel a bit better) id'ed it as a black pop hybrid, linking the fast regowth and fast dieback as being typical.

 

Anyone confirm etc this theory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

I thinks the fungi is probably incidental. The fruiting body you have there looks like the common earthball (Scleroderma citrinum).

 

Here's various pics...

 

http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=Scleroderma%20citrinum&cr=countryUK%7CcountryGB&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

 

As for the poplar... no idea :)

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

no words of wisdom, but if you find out the cause please pm me - i had 2 lombady's die in about 4 weeks, that i have to remove as they were 6 feet from a tenis court and we couldn't risk the H&S implications. The leaves discoloured, then died in a only a couple of weeks and fell off within 4.....

 

No sign of fruiting bodies and very limited potential for poisoning. bloody mystery?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I took some of the dying branches out to one of my instructors from collage he could not come up with a reason for the dieback. He could only confirm the dieback appeared to be rapid and would affect the trees safety within a short period of time.

One interesting note was that on branch cross sections it was clear to see where he tree had tried to compartmentalise the decay but had failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.