Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

10,000 fine for breech of felling licence in magistrate court


stevelucocq
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Forestry Commission, and I'm talking England, haven't prosecuted anyone in years. At least not since the law changed to allow them to pursue re-stocking without a prosecution. And pursuing restocking is what they do, at least in England.

 

So well done Natural Resources Wales.

 

As far as I am aware the same legislation applies to Wales as England, but I sit to be corrected.

 

If re-stocking is pursued, and there's no reason why not, the developer won't be able to develop the land for as long as the restocking notice is in force, usually 10 years. Planning permission does not override the re-stocking inotice. If it was the developers intention to increase the chances of development, they could have shot themselves in the foot.

 

Ed

 

thanks for this edwardc

 

yes I think your right about the developer shooting themself in the foot. There was a development I know of where they felled all the boundary trees in hope of increasing the number of dwellings on the site. This did not work in there favour as the trees screened the site and hudge local objection followed. Also the lpa cant have been too pleased either. I have seen a number of sites thst have preemptive clear felled or partially felled and overall heaches can follow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

The Forestry Commission, and I'm talking England, haven't prosecuted anyone in years. At least not since the law changed to allow them to pursue re-stocking without a prosecution. And pursuing restocking is what they do, at least in England.

 

So well done Natural Resources Wales.

 

As far as I am aware the same legislation applies to Wales as England, but I sit to be corrected.

 

If re-stocking is pursued, and there's no reason why not, the developer won't be able to develop the land for as long as the restocking notice is in force, usually 10 years. Planning permission does not override the re-stocking notice. If it was the developers intention to increase the chances of development, they could have shot themselves in the foot.

 

Ed

 

There was a prosecution last year for an illegal felling of scots pine at a site north of Basingstoke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.