Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

sueonmull

Member
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

sueonmull's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

  1. These comments are from a Guardian article. For anyone who isn't already bored to death they can read all the comments here: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jul/31/pulborough-brooks-sussex-shining-blossoms-divide-opinions#comments I'll be adding no more to this thread.
  2. Hi Prunus, My reluctance to reply is purely because of the predictable nature and recognisable style of your comments. There is perhaps an example of nit-picking in one of my previous posts on another Arbtalk thread, if there’s anything else you’d like me to justify/expand on please just ask. Perhaps you could PM me to prevent the thread potentially deteriorating. I don’t think I mentioned horses in my posts but if you have any issues with the information put out by equine charities then I’d certainly hope you’d take that up with them, I can only speak for myself. You are correct about being unable to positively attribute liver damage to PAs, my original post is nearly 12 months old and things do move on – are you suggesting that means PA toxicity doesn’t exist? There are websites out there that need updates in other areas and I suggest you might want to encourage them to do so. As for criticising my debating skills that perhaps not for me to judge but it’s never a positive approach to an any issue. I think with any contentious subject it is important to look for common ground and build on it. For the elimination of any doubt I am all for appropriate control as opposed to no control. FERA produced a report for DEFRA collating all the scientific data on ragwort and identifying gaps where further work is required. If you Google “Review of Evidence concerning Ragwort Impacts Ecology and Control options” anyone interested can download it. It needs to be read as a whole document as selective quotes can be misleading – issues are not black and white.
  3. Would look nice but it's in a quite exposed spot and it gets pretty windy here so likely to get blown to bits.
  4. Thanks Betula, I'd thought of carving something interesting like a mushroom, sadly I'm lacking skills in the whittling department and it may end up looking like something which would bring down the tone of the neighbourhood. It's still a possibility though if I can find someone on the island who could do it and it would still be able to accommodate insects.
  5. Thanks everyone will try to use all your ideas.
  6. We have just had a tree cut down because the roots at the bottom were rotting. Have left the stump about 3 foot high. Before I cut it down to the base I’m looking for ideas on what to do with it, specifically with respect to providing nest sites for insects – it’s probably in too windy for anything to grow up it. Any thoughts?
  7. If you're short of words I've learnt a fair few Scottish ones that might suit .....!
  8. Oh bugger, poor you. I bet someone will pick you up on the invasive word. Funnily enough I’ve just been having a long twitter conversation with someone about how the word is used. As a layman I use the term invasive probably as you do – for something that basically is unwanted and encroaching somewhere I don't want it to. However naturalists use the term invasive ONLY to describe non-native species of flora or fauna. So whilst most will understand perfectly what you are saying, anyone who wants to nit pick will say your maligning a native plane which is an excuse to tell you you don’t know what you’re talking about! You have my sympathy.
  9. That's horrible, so sorry.
  10. Unfortunately if you go on the internet (twitter or facebook) you'll find people saying that's not a problem as long as it is a big enough field and there is enough grass for them to eat - good excuse to do nothing in my book and not a good way of educating those livestock owner who know no better.
  11. Me too, that's probably the worst thing anyone can do with ragwort short of putting it directly in a hay rack! So difficult with it being a neighbour - I assume they understand the potential consequences of what they've done?
  12. Pasture management is certainly important and as a very broad generalisation what you say is true Steve. Ragwort germination rates are lower in ‘ideal’ pastures and it is less likely to become established but it will still germinate and if is growing abundantly on nearby ground that makes pasture management all the more challenging. I’ve been doing my own ‘field trials’ over the past few years and contrary to what I had read I actually find more ragwort seedlings in the dense areas of grass than in the bare patches/rabbit scrapes that I’d deliberately left to see what grows. The majority of seedlings are unlikely to develop to become larger rosettes or even mature plants but they are still toxic and may be eaten ‘hidden’ in amongst longer grasses either fresh or wilted. May be little and often but that is the insidious nature of chronic poisoning. It’s very easy to see flowering ragwort plants, less easy to see the rosettes and even more difficult to spot the early seedlings. FERA carried out a review of the evidence concerning ragwort impacts, ecology and control options. It is an interesting read highlighting gaps in the data which require further work. Link is here http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CCwQFjACahUKEwjc86HCwd3GAhWGWBQKHQ_PAs4&url=http%3A%2F%2Frandd.defra.gov.uk%2FDocument.aspx%3FDocument%3D12217_Reviewofevidenceconcerningragwortimpactsecologyandcontroloptions.pdf&ei=TYSmVZyZIoaxUY-ei_AM&usg=AFQjCNFACEaNBIAQMjggqQL1fIXsqyZksA&bvm=bv.97653015,d.ZGU It is worth reading the whole document but (at the risk of being accused of quote mining!) if I can point you to page 42 it says “It has been shown experimentally under greenhouse conditions that 35 days post sowing, 30.8% of seeds will germinate on bare ground as opposed to 14.4% on short pasture and 15.2% on long pasture (Phung and Popay, 1981).” OK so it’s greenhouse/ideal conditions but germination is only reduced by half on long pasture compared to bare ground which in the scheme of things is still a lot of seedlings when you consider that, as a very conservative figure, a single ragwort plant can produce 50000 seeds. If only 1% germinated that’s still a fair number.
  13. No locking horns at this end either Kevin good to try and see from all sides. Domestication/selective breeding whether that be with animals or crops undoubtedly has an effect but whether it has solved more problems than it has caused is a whole new area for discussion.
  14. First just a quick correction of the quote, I wrote “doesn’t belong in or near livestock grazing” not "doesn't belong near livestock or grazing“ Domestication and selective breeding of stock complicates the issue of instinctive behaviour, this article is interesting http://www.cals.uidaho.edu/sustag/launchbaugh.pdf Not all farmers fit the stereotype you describe, for example this award winning farm manages to help wildlife to thrive https://www.buglife.org.uk/blog/matt-shardlow-ceo/controlled-life-and-wildlife despite not tolerating thistles, docks, nettles and ragwort. Few are suggesting eradication or decimation of any native species and I totally agree there's always middle ground.
  15. Certain species are more sensitive but within each species the sex, age, diet, general health etc of each individual can affect its susceptibility to PAs and some species may be very resistant to some PAs but highly sensitive to others. It’s a minefield out there and there will always be exceptions to the rule such as animals that can apparently consume unusually large quantities of the toxic plant with no obvious side effects. Due to the cumulative nature of damage caused by PAs animals may appear clinically normal and show no symptoms at all until months after any ragwort has been consumed. Even with a post mortem the cause of death cannot be 100% attributed to ragwort. Websites such as the one you quoted earlier Steve suggest those wanting a proportionate level of ragwort control (within 50m of grazing/hay fields) are hysterical and in the process they are convincing people that ragwort is really nothing to worry about. Following the guidelines of the Ragwort Code of Practice should atleast ensure that ragwort is removed only where it is judged to be a risk. Where it is not it can be left for the benefit of invertebrates. Pasture management plays an important part in reducing ragwort in grazing but appropriate control in neighbouring areas is also important giving those who maintain grazing and/or grow forage, perhaps as their livelihood, the best chance of producing a ragwort free product.

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.