Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

RPA Calculations


Tom D
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just doing a Wee planning query, objecting to an application, one of the trees in question is multi-stemmed, calculating the RPA using the Helliwell method gives an RPA of 5.3 m using the other method of 10 x diameter above the root flare gives 12.5m. This difference could have a significant impact on the application.. 5837 gives a measurement guide showing the individual measurement of stems but does not supply a formula. Anyone know the 'approved' method?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Sorry can't answer your question as years since I've had to use this sort of calculation but out of interest how come your getting involved with objecting to a application?

I'm not saying your wrong and mind your own business like we often hear on here.

Also if I started quoting helliwell to the local council they wouldn't have a clue what I was going on about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm acting for a family member, tbh I don't mind arguing the toss with another consultant. It's just business at the end of the day, I wouldn't take offence if someone took issue with a survey that I had done.

Plus I think I have a strong case...:biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BS5837 also says 12 times stem diameter, should also be measuring at 1.5m above the ground

 

page 10 ish of bs5387, rpa calcs, trees two to five stems

stem 1 squared + stem 2 squared + stem 3 squared + stem 4 squared + stem 5 squared. Then square root the final answer, i cant find the square root sign etc on my keyboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just doing a Wee planning query, objecting to an application, one of the trees in question is multi-stemmed, calculating the RPA using the Helliwell method gives an RPA of 5.3 m using the other method of 10 x diameter above the root flare gives 12.5m. This difference could have a significant impact on the application.. 5837 gives a measurement guide showing the individual measurement of stems but does not supply a formula. Anyone know the 'approved' method?

 

The 10 x diameter is from the 2005 standard and is no longer used; this and the Helliwell method is not to the current BS5837 British Standard. Arnold describes the correct calculation method in the above post.

It is the average dtameter for more than 5 stems.

Edited by Alan Webster
Added a bit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the average dtameter for more than 5 stems.

 

Slight clarifiction, over 5 stems you use the average diameter, square it, multiply this by teh number of stems and then take the square root of that. The method in the current BS relies on finding the total cross sectional area of all the stems added together, then finding the equivalent single stem diameter for that cross sectional area. The 12.5x 'rule' is then applied to that hypothetical diameter to find the RPA radius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry can't answer your question as years since I've had to use this sort of calculation but out of interest how come your getting involved with objecting to a application?

I'm not saying your wrong and mind your own business like we often hear on here.

Also if I started quoting helliwell to the local council they wouldn't have a clue what I was going on about.

 

You'll go a long way to find a TO which doesn't know who Heliwell is!!! :confused1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost there. Essentially there is no 12 x diameter = root protection area, I know it says there is but... Once you have the diameter of the single stemmed tree, or its equivalent for multi stemmed trees, measured in accordance with Annex C of BS 5837, and calculated as per the formulae in para 4.6.1 of BS 5837, you use table D1 in Annex D of BS 5837 to give you your root protection area. And in most cases that isn't exactly 12 x the diameter of the stem.

 

Ed

 

Tell you what I find odd. The fact that you measure stem diameter to the nearest 10mm and then calculate in accordance with annex D which is rounded to 25mm. Why not just measure to the nearest 25mm and then multiply by 12 for the radius.

 

Also, I may be wrong but it doesn't say whether to calculate to the nearest 25mm or round up to nearest 25mm. Or at least I haven't been able to find it. What you think Ed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost there. Essentially there is no 12 x diameter = root protection area, I know it says there is but... Once you have the diameter of the single stemmed tree, or its equivalent for multi stemmed trees, measured in accordance with Annex C of BS 5837, and calculated as per the formulae in para 4.6.1 of BS 5837, you use table D1 in Annex D of BS 5837 to give you your root protection area. And in most cases that isn't exactly 12 x the diameter of the stem.

 

Ed

 

Nope, I was there. The original post was about arriving at a RPA radius. The area is a pretty useless quantity to know unless you are planning to deviate from the default circular RPA. So the key thing in this posting was the RPAr. Annex D calls this the 'Radius of nominal circle" ('RoNC'). In all cases in Annex D the single stem diameter is exactly 1/12th of the RoNC.

 

But as subsequently mentioned, the RPA is rounded to the nearest m2. This is necessary because the area is always pi x (RPAr)2, which can never be a whole number.

 

I have never used Annex D, nor do I intend to because I don't need to. RPAr = 12 x DBH. And RPA = pi x (RPAr)2. Then I do the rounding at the end, manually or by Excel.

 

The discrepancy caused by rounding relative to calculation is greatest for small values of DBH and RPAr. The greatest is for RPAr 0.90, where the error is 17%. This error disappears to a trivial 0.04% by RPAr 15.00.

 

I don't see that 5837 directs the user to round the DBH up or down to the nearest 25mm. As has been said, this is inconsistent anyway with Clause 4.4.2.6 which says to record the DBH to nearest 10mm.

 

For completeness, the greatest error that could be caused by rounding the DBH to nearest 25mm would be rounding 85mm actual DBH up to recorded 90mm, then rounding this up to 100mm to use Annex D. The true RPA would be 3.26m2, but Annex D gives 5m2. A whopping 53% error (hmm)!.

 

Clearly Annex D will be useful if you don't have a calculator but just as clearly (to my pedantic mind) interpolation is expected or at least possible. And in hindsight it would be better if Annex D used intervals of DBH 10mm. I have put one together quickly if anyone wants it (attached).

alt annex D.xls

Edited by daltontrees
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.