Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Fracture pruned induced bud formation from callus tissue


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

After watching and trying to record this phenomenon for a number of years, we finally came across what are undoubtedly adventitious epicormic buds, forming on callus tissue formed on the edges of a deliberately torn/fractured branch.

 

The tree below is a lapsed 350 year old beech pollard which is subject to a cyclical pruning regime to manage down the lapsed pollard poles back toward the bolling. Removing branch weight (which can lead to pollard poles naturally fracturing off the tree due to lever arm and decay issues) whilst where possible, maintaining a retrenching canopy where buds develop lower down and within the existing canopy. This technique hopefully leads to a more stable tree which aims to both continue to exist and maintain a cultural woodland practice and enhance the sites fragile biodiversity.

 

On assessment, this branch had no buds to prune it back to on its last cycle (some 4/5 years ago) so it was sacrificed back to a relatively long stub to remove significant wood weight from the delicate bolling.

 

The fracture was created to expose the maximum amount of potential callus tissue as was possible, without ripping it back to and past the bolling point at the top of the trunk.

 

This practice, (although not scientific and looking like a 'cowboy arborist' has been attacking it with a pole saw) has the potential to offer up additional options to help with the reduction process which can be stretched across decades.

 

 

More buds forming lower down, the better !

 

.

IMG_6755.JPG.0681c6a95ddc866f427af116bdf49e6a.JPG

IMG_6771.jpg.f643165b8e5bfe6a39663cf5c31abdc3.jpg

IMG_6753.JPG.6b8910583a4ee6016f33867be5aa336b.JPG

IMG_6758.jpg.2276f67d888e0fafe8eecd6dee72ea6d.jpg

IMG_6759.jpg.fddad235562d54aba58cbcc9903a1a16.jpg

IMG_6793.JPG.f831333079d48e57a36f9c0f26e7df83.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

In an attempt to replicate the outcome above, (whilst the tree was being worked on again this week and on another similar branch which had no option for short linear reduction) we've mimicked the first fracture by creating a new one on the same same side (cardinal point) of the crown.

 

This fracture was created by partially cutting through the top of the branch at a steep angle and carefully pulling it apart with a tag line to get a slow long tear.

 

It will be interesting to see if the fact that the original fracture which was on the north side of the tree (away from UV desiccation) was whether this is the key to successful callus bud formation.

 

As a control, there are other fractures on other pollards facing different cardinals

.

IMG_6868.jpg.6a134b728d43e3ddb12df0f98c21a37b.jpg

IMG_6867.jpg.0912b3bee25537f452c665ab687cf366.jpg

IMG_6832.JPG.6034b060fba4c6ee5c0326c941a2dcfc.JPG

IMG_6831.JPG.b0f91d2a6150292b2e63d0884cddc5b6.JPG

IMG_6830.JPG.94363264cb414f974a63ed11641d64f2.JPG

IMG_6826.JPG.a2d40da242ad891d324e24acdadf3861.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IME these aren't too unusual growing from the callus on 'topped' beechs with internodal cuts but although they're present, growth often appears retarded and long term survival seems intermittent as rule.

 

Maybe 1 in four shoots grow on, the other three sulk for a year or two at the size in your photo's before just dying off. Never thought about why this should occur. Of course its a lot more bleak up north:biggrin:

 

Nicely recorded as always David.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IME these aren't too unusual growing from the callus on 'topped' beechs with internodal cuts but although they're present, growth often appears retarded and long term survival seems intermittent as rule.

 

I think this is a given Gary.

 

It's something we looked at fairly closely whilst climbing and recording the pollards in the Basque in 2009 (specifically cuts and regrowth) for Helen Read's Arb Journal paper on "Restoration of lapsed pollards; Evaluation of techniques and guidance for future work" Volume 35, Issue 2, 2013

 

I think what's perhaps important here is the orientation of the exposed wood to desiccation.

Hence the historical mulch mats in one of the attached images.

 

I heard Dr Dirk Dujesiefken talk last year where he looked at some studies at covering natural wounds and pruning wounds with breathable materials to help keep them from desiccating and then observing meristematic tissue forming on the wounds, where they would perhaps dry up and do nothing if left uncovered.

 

 

.

DSC00950.JPG.a19419a2f9f7cd0a01c8a9d0465aa809.JPG

DSC00926.JPG.10e602dfc8a58710bfa2ffcf9884b70a.JPG

DSC00328.jpg.b8fce5f58d9eae2fbb2a3546d6b5a028.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a given Gary.

 

It's something we looked at fairly closely whilst climbing and recording the pollards in the Basque in 2009 (specifically cuts and regrowth) for Helen Read's Arb Journal paper on "Restoration of lapsed pollards; Evaluation of techniques and guidance for future work" Volume 35, Issue 2, 2013

 

I think what's perhaps important here is the orientation of the exposed wood to desiccation.

Hence the historical mulch mats in one of the attached images.

 

I heard Dr Dirk Dujesiefken talk last year where he looked at some studies at covering natural wounds and pruning wounds with breathable materials to help keep them from desiccating and then observing meristematic tissue forming on the wounds, where they would perhaps dry up and do nothing if left uncovered.

 

 

.

 

 

Interesting stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank You David! I've waited for years to see that evidence. As Gary says it's not overpoweringly vigorous, but it's a start!

 

I'm still inclined to cut to nodes, as was done here in 2002; pic taken 2010.

Sprouts from dormant buds are bound to be better anchored; this one held up 200#! I'd have been in a bad way if it had failed.

 

Yes drying would be a primary consideration with epicormics, as light may be for endocormic (from dormant buds) sprouts. But this 'stub' is in the lower part of the crown, facing east. It may get a little midday light.

 

What would be exciting would be to add some 'scientific' cuts to buds into your experiment. I'm not sure I understand how "On assessment, this branch had no buds to prune it back to..." I see a lot of nodes with evidence of buds on the other branches.

 

The branch in the pic just had bulges to aim for, but it worked out well on that beech branch. :thumbup1:

59766fad9539f_sproutwraptorbeech.jpg.1a449df3ee338c4bb9775bcfb27e27be.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.