Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Horse logging


cousin jack
 Share

Recommended Posts

Deffinatley not Suffolk Punch..... closer to clydesdale than the suffolk.. I see the ardennes is mentioned already though.

 

Has anyone used shires at all?

 

Shires are ok on the flat, if you can find one that is bred to work, not show. But they are to big, like an oil tanker, if you are working steep, awkward sites you want something small, powerfull, and with brains, the Ardennes are all of that, when people ask what sort of horse I've got, I tell them, " a Sherman tank on legs".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Shires are ok on the flat, if you can find one that is bred to work, not show. But they are to big, like an oil tanker, if you are working steep, awkward sites you want something small, powerfull, and with brains, the Ardennes are all of that, when people ask what sort of horse I've got, I tell them, " a Sherman tank on legs".

 

LOL they are certainly that alright.

 

If the shire's are too big, I would say that the Suffolk Punch would be immense as if you are relating a Shire to an oil tanker, then the punch has to be a super-tanker!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a bloke who had a stint horse logging a few years back when it first came in vogue with the likes of the National Trust, wildlife Trusts and Natural England (or whatever they're calling themselves this week). He used Ardennes, I think Percheron (sp) was the other breed of choice. He knocked it on the head after a while as he could'nt make it pay and went back to a Valmet.

Nice idea in theory,but at the end of the day you cant beat a comfy seat and a heated cab:001_cool:

The Environmental bods always used to pontificate about the alleged benefits of using horses,i.e less damage to the ground than machinery, but so much of that is down to weather conditions and time of year.If they were a little more flexible regards summer extraction there would'nt be an issue. A forwarding tractor in dry ground conditions does'nt make half the mess a pair of horses does in winter - ever looked at a well used bridleway?:001_rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deffinatley not Suffolk Punch..... closer to clydesdale than the suffolk.. I see the ardennes is mentioned already though.

 

Has anyone used shires at all?

 

Had and worked a 'vanner', he was shire cross heavy cob, a 15 and half hands,all body with shortish legs,try & post a pic if I can find one.:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are these the guys that usually go to the apf?

No, that is a chap called Doug Joiner, he makes a living from running courses doing demos and bracken bashing and suchlike, but he is not a full time horse logger. Simon is unique in that he will often buy the timber standing and market it himself, therefore he lives or starves by his judgement, and skill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a bloke who had a stint horse logging a few years back when it first came in vogue with the likes of the National Trust, wildlife Trusts and Natural England (or whatever they're calling themselves this week). He used Ardennes, I think Percheron (sp) was the other breed of choice. He knocked it on the head after a while as he could'nt make it pay and went back to a Valmet.

Nice idea in theory,but at the end of the day you cant beat a comfy seat and a heated cab:001_cool:

The Environmental bods always used to pontificate about the alleged benefits of using horses,i.e less damage to the ground than machinery, but so much of that is down to weather conditions and time of year.If they were a little more flexible regards summer extraction there would'nt be an issue. A forwarding tractor in dry ground conditions does'nt make half the mess a pair of horses does in winter - ever looked at a well used bridleway?:001_rolleyes:

 

It's a niche market, there is a chap in Scotland, Jim Johnstone, he would be a full timer if he could but FC will not give him any work with the horses, so he drives a conventional forwarder for a living. As to the benefits, horses can work where machinery struggles, damage to the floor is superficial, no compaction, less damage to residual crop, no noise/pollution, brilliant for use on regen sites, and PAWS. We can't compete with conventional equipment, and we don't want to,but we can work alongside it, as in the pictures, steep site, horses to ride and landing, then pick up by conventional forwarder. Simples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.