Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Zipline, thoughts


RC0
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

There's less Danger in my setups Paul, because I know how to mitigate it. It takes experience.

 

This is not advice, but if you were wanting to experience danger.....strip out a 100 ft + conifer and dump the top onto a wide angles zip line. Only needs to be hand tight and locked off at the ground anchor.....rest assured the top will take care of the tensioning you speak of.

 

Is it vogue to make videos of speed lines like this? I don't watch those hyper produced pop videos, been always interested in technique over glorification. If it is so then what a regress...sheesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody and their dog out here wants me to show them how to speed line, it gets under my skin because I

have no idea what they are asking. Why does the speed line have such mystique, certainly topping out at that height and diameter takes careful planning and a brave heart but for me has little technical interest. I can't call it because our skinny trees don't get much past 30M, still a sketchy scenario but I choose to train the guys to dynamic rig over free falling, for me the physics lay in our control that way.

As speed lines become interesting technically, heavy sections, multiple stages, objects to traverse past/under/around they get equally boring. Speediness bore me and on that note I shall make some slings up, give it a go and perhaps end up with my foot in mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody and their dog out here wants me to show them how to speed line, it gets under my skin because I

have no idea what they are asking. Why does the speed line have such mystique, certainly topping out at that height and diameter takes careful planning and a brave heart but for me has little technical interest. I can't call it because our skinny trees don't get much past 30M, still a sketchy scenario but I choose to train the guys to dynamic rig over free falling, for me the physics lay in our control that way.

As speed lines become interesting technically, heavy sections, multiple stages, objects to traverse past/under/around they get equally boring. Speediness bore me and on that note I shall make some slings up, give it a go and perhaps end up with my foot in mouth.

 

It's the fastest, and most energy efficient way to rig a conifer, or similar single stemmed tree....hands down.

 

Watch the other vid I put out previous to this. The economy of effort and time is very apparent. Just me and one other guy. The tree had to be rigged because of stuff underneath, no way around it. So, to rig the limbs conventional style Darrell (groundworker) has to lower each limb to the bottom of the tree, lay it out somewhere, then cut it up, and then make a couple journeys at least dragging the branches to the burn-pile....or could easily be a chipper on a different site. It becomes a 5-10 minute turn around per limb, if he's works hard....less time as we get into the small stuff past 100 ft. Meanwhile I'm redundant for long periods, waiting. That set-up needs 2 groundworker to realistically keep me busy. It'd be tedious, and I'd probably price my self out of the job with such a wasteful and time consuming strategy.

 

The zipline is probably one limb per minute on average, once we're set up. Darren doesn't waste any time or energy because the limbs are delivered right to him, over the targets, facing the right way. Large and small, it doesn't matter. No need for a 3rd guy. No sawing, no dragging, simple hardware.

 

Why would you want to spend time going from A to B to C, when you can skip B altogether, effortlessly ? Is that too boring, Paul ?

 

The logic is so obvious. Mystique doesn't come into it.

 

What I tried to convey in the video, is that there are measures you can take to make the job safer by a margin or two.

 

You should get on to that. By the looks of the fauna out there I'd bet it's a technique thatd lend itself well. It's gonna happen anyway. In your shoes I'd rather be the pioneer than not.

 

Adam, we usually tension by hand. Occasionally a 2:1, but not often.

Edited by RC0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the fastest, and most energy efficient way to rig a conifer, or similar single stemmed tree....hands down.

 

Watch the other vid I put out previous to this. The economy of effort and time is very apparent. Just me and one other guy. The tree had to be rigged because of stuff underneath, no way around it. So, to rig the limbs conventional style Darrell (groundworker) has to lower each limb to the bottom of the tree, lay it out somewhere, then cut it up, and then make a couple journeys at least dragging the branches to the burn-pile....or could easily be a chipper on a different site. It becomes a 5-10 minute turn around per limb, if he's works hard....less time as we get into the small stuff past 100 ft. Meanwhile I'm redundant for long periods, waiting. That set-up needs 2 groundworker to realistically keep me busy. It'd be tedious, and I'd probably price my self out of the job with such a wasteful and time consuming strategy.

 

The zipline is probably one limb per minute on average, once we're set up. Darren doesn't waste any time or energy because the limbs are delivered right to him, over the targets, facing the right way. Large and small, it doesn't matter. No need for a 3rd guy. No sawing, no dragging, simple hardware.

 

Why would you want to spend time going from A to B to C, when you can skip B altogether, effortlessly ? Is that too boring, Paul ?

 

The logic is so obvious. Mystique doesn't come into it.

 

What I tried to convey in the video, is that there are measures you can take to make the job safer by a margin or two.

 

You should get on to that. By the looks of the fauna out there I'd bet it's a technique thatd lend itself well. It's gonna happen anyway. In your shoes I'd rather be the pioneer than not.

 

Adam, we usually tension by hand. Occasionally a 2:1, but not often.

 

Well, yes and no. Out here I learnt a lot about pre-rigging, perhaps it is the smaller tree, I'm not sure, but in many situations we can drop a few branches here and there into the structure and fell it or pick it out whole, nobody is sitting around waiting for another, just a different way, location specific, of getting it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, yes and no. Out here I learnt a lot about pre-rigging, perhaps it is the smaller tree, I'm not sure, but in many situations we can drop a few branches here and there into the structure and fell it or pick it out whole, nobody is sitting around waiting for another, just a different way, location specific, of getting it done.

 

Smaller tree ? doesnt matter, its the same principal. Ive watched some of your videos in

past. Its mostly typical of tree work anywhere. Trees, targets below, and resources to deal with them.

 

Heres a small tree. but it still had to be rigged. I couldve dumped it all at the bottom of the tree of course, and dragged it through the gate. But why ? We were there about 2 hours from memory. Me and another guy. A different style of slinging though.

 

http://arbtalk.co.uk/forum/video-forum/73586-zipline-swinging-limbs.html

 

You're still young Paul. Dont get set in your ways out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey reg/Tim hope your both well. Sorry but can't see reg's vid cos wifi is too slow here. I always felt that letting branches run was the fastest and easiest for little pieces and doesn't tie up grounds men. Dumping branches on to a taught line and letting it run a little combined with control line works good for medium chuncks. For big limbs dropping it all in to a slack system with a control line and add tension after worked for me. I think the vid Tim posted had a bit of everything. If your pushing it I always used to prefer a smaller rope in the hope that the rope was the weakest part of the system over the tree I was tied too.

 

Mat

Edited by gibbon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.