Jump to content
David Humphries

Managing Trees with Decay & Dysfunction

Recommended Posts

Hey!

 

Cool stuff. What's the local soil type and how did the topography affect the tree?

 

Cheers, Island

 

 

Hello Island, hope you're well

 

The tree sits on a north facing slope of London clay which is a neutral soil type.

The localalised hydrology is poor due in part to the slope and the top soil is devoid of humus and pretty dry for half of the year.

 

 

 

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Red oak with long time colonisation of the white rot dysfunction and decay of Ganoderma resinaceum.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.f4e2904e720d3890105a7e6b1e217dbe.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.799b2a98a0ae3f6547d8d4c1b84b4b6d.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.e83d96e79a94ed0513668ddb814d6ae8.jpeg

 

Over the last 12 years we've been mapping the decay in the trunk via watching the annual fruit body locations, the ongoing buttress development, accustic signature (nylon hammer) and utilising both the earlier Dmp decay microdrill and then the more advanced IML Resi Pd400 to determine the ongoing residual wall strength and proportion.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.de9cb5c33dfacefc577a86a2253b02bd.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.0658ed2baf3ed92478588488755fd5f1.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.18c67af304d366d32740d908ce079cbe.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.b545607ffd7671c04d04e671d3e9c2c9.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.b926b8026a0b33662fb5113b98f5472b.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.207bfdb877aebfe1a41f97b1a7be20af.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.27cb0f29cd4194546f0af2cc69683843.jpeg

 

A neighbouring red oak failed at the base (Laetiporus) in the St Judes storm of a few years back.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.ecad9f84117426d593232249e6bf1685.jpeg

 

The exposure to further wind load from the loss of its neighbour has led us  to eventually start on a phased reduction by removing 2m of the canopy. (Rob and Jack climbing)

 

image.thumb.jpeg.35f6d4385608805700ce187906e88382.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.145832fc2a26238e7cf698c2ef79e23d.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.dcfb61dbd927dbdfa4d16b404d052bd4.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.12f0610a2ebcff21e07ace69c4f0b477.jpeg

 

Depending on development of epicormic buds (red oak are known for strong epi growth), we intend to continue the reductions to bring the canopy down further in height and volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Steve Bullman said:

Did the tree that failed have the same decay fungi?

No, as I mentioned above, Laetiporus decay was the only 'known' associate before that tree failed. That tree never had resinaceum fruiting on it before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another red oak with evidence of a basal colonisation (this time) of  Pholiota squarrosa

 

IMG_0334.thumb.JPG.ec3082bfdcbb621a98998c517d0a64da.JPG


 

IMG_0314.thumb.JPG.a262ce96a2095c646d80e6477aa27601.JPGIMG_0318.thumb.JPG.ca9a2ef0057746c97df7f2288f7dbca8.JPG

IMG_0319.thumb.JPG.b0f7dfda1cab989fb115e3339aa02024.JPG

IMG_0322.thumb.JPG.2ab3c861a31558d41cd4a7851351e38e.JPG

 

We've carried out micro-drill readings and sounding with a nylon hammer which indicates that the (now) forming semi autonomous units (root/buttress units) are currently vascular & sound enough to retain the tree.

 

IMG_0320.thumb.JPG.cf3e5566452d45510e50e5dcffc77a64.JPG

 

This one has a very good Potential Roost Feature (PRF) in the trunk.

 

IMG_0313.thumb.JPG.ade07ef5e013a54a28db64db22c69e7f.JPG

 

 

Canopy has been reduced up to 2m to lessen the wind load on the sail.

 

Rob Taylor/Dendrophile in the harness

 

IMG_0335.thumb.JPG.379fd59184415c5f68372ffef51799ad.JPG

IMG_0340.thumb.JPG.88abf85f3087c39723a889229c522a01.JPG

IMG_0461.thumb.JPG.cad8ccc2612e12b9ff63aa6eefecee5a.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Monolithed this sycamore yesterday at an estate we manage.

On the other side of the hedge is a busy A road and a not so busy footpath adjacent. Prevailing wind heads towards the road and the site is very exposed.

The tree had been vandalised around 3 years ago and the bark peeled off the lower trunk on the right hand side. Flammulina velutipes has colonised the dysfunctional trunk with Armillaria sp. also present but the species unknown.

 

Due to the dysfunctional trunk, the tree has gone into severe decline on the right hand side of the picture and so the decision was made to remove the sail area, although the tree was not a stability risk.

Hopefully the trunk will remain standing for quite a few years to come.  

Untitled.png

Untitled 2.png

Untitled 3.png

Untitled 4.png

Untitled 5.png

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.