Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Mycological Tree Assessment (MTA)


Fungus
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I understand the concept of 'panic fruiting' and in the case of the Sparassis it is obvious. But how can a FB be recognised as 'panic fruiting'. Or can you only tell if you have the whole picture (tree+fungus+environment).

 

Yes and no. Sometimes you have to assess and monitor the tree-fungus-environment "picture" over some years, as f.i. often is the case with annual biotrophic parasitic macrofungi, such as Meripilus giganteus or Pholiota squarrosa (photo 1) fruiting with lots of and/or extremely big FB's, in which case you also have to assess and monitor the panic fruiting of the tree characterized by lots of smaller and/or sterile seeds and the decline or vanishing of tree species specific ectomycorrhizal macrofungi.

And with perennial bracket fungi you can often recognize panic fruiting by receding fertile tube layers (see second photo of Phellinus ignarius on Salix) or by (partially) sterile more or less bulbous FB's (see third photo of Daedalea quercina on Quercus rubra).

---

Doolhofzwam-(halfsteriele-k.jpg.8f6439469154180cc84ce842e0d343b0.jpg

Wilg-Echte-vuurzwam.jpg.29c38ba5f238a792b32ff7452633dcad.jpg

Plataan-Schubbige-bundelzwa.jpg.8bb6a4677a26ea2c4ee16b372261c5e9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

G. pfeifferi- showing retraction, both beeches, both with viable healthy crowns, I know what I feel this is telling me but what are your thoughts

 

Tony,

To produce new tube layers on the perennial brackets, the mycelium of G. pfeiferii has to decompose energy rich cellulose (a sugar polymere) from the dead wood of the central column of the beech and convert it into chitine (another sugar polymere), the building material of which the cell walls of fungi (mainly) are made. That is why fungi are closer related to insects then to (green) plants capable of producing energy (sugars) through fotosynthesis by and for themselves and the tree species specific ecosystem, to which the fungi (and insects) connect.

For this, the mycelium only needs some hyphae connected to the living tissue of the tree to tap some energy from for the converting process, so in this respect, the mycelium for the greater part acts as a saprotrophic without doing much damage to the cambium, which explains the still viable healthy crown.

Once the available cellulose taken from the tree diminishes, the mycelium can no longer form complete new tube layers, so the layers start to receed or retract, which is a symptom of panic fruiting because of the lack of energy provided by the tree's inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and no. Sometimes you have to assess and monitor the tree-fungus-environment "picture" over some years, as f.i. often is the case with annual biotrophic parasitic macrofungi, such as Meripilus giganteus or Pholiota squarrosa (photo 1) fruiting with lots of and/or extremely big FB's, in which case you also have to assess and monitor the panic fruiting of the tree characterized by lots of smaller and/or sterile seeds and the decline or vanishing of tree species specific ectomycorrhizal macrofungi.

And with perennial bracket fungi you can often recognize panic fruiting by receding fertile tube layers (see second photo of Phellinus ignarius on Salix) or by (partially) sterile more or less bulbous FB's (see third photo of Daedalea quercina on Quercus rubra).

---

 

Thank you Gerrit,

 

I posted this picture before, but that was before you were on this forum, so I'll re-try :001_smile: Could this bulbous, deformed fruiting body be a form of panic fruiting (possibly of Laetiporus)? It was on the same Q. rubra stem as the big Laetiporus FB, some 50 cm away. It is a standing monolith dead stem, probably cut when the tree was declining, before it was dead (no more exact info). It does not exactly fit the picture, because I guess the Laetiporus can continue digesting the wood saprotrophically, so no reason for panic fruiting. Enlighten me :001_smile:, just trying to get more insight here...

 

Cheers,

Tom

PICT0628.jpg.2183ae8538003dc52a671f24a6e47330.jpg

IMGP0286.jpg.3e4fd0acf1a3092e51888bf93588c274.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And with perennial bracket fungi you can often recognize panic fruiting by receding fertile tube layers

 

Another example of this phenomenon, a perennial bracket of Fomes fomentarius, of which the last formed tube layer was already receding before the birch broke and fell down because of the intensive white rot of the central wood column, leaving not enough cellulose behind to restart the mycelium to produce new layers.

---

Fomes-fomentarius-berk.jpg.11d38a8f0954b35d7666f392e1320bbe.jpg

Edited by Fungus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could this bulbous, deformed fruiting body be a form of panic fruiting (possibly of Laetiporus)? It was on the same Q. rubra stem as the big Laetiporus FB, some 50 cm away. It is a standing monolith dead stem, probably cut when the tree was declining, before it was dead (no more exact info). It does not exactly fit the picture, because I guess the Laetiporus can continue digesting the wood saprotrophically, so no reason for panic fruiting.

 

Tom,

I think the first FB's are either partially a sterile or an anamorph reproductive form (Ceriomyces aurantiacus), mostly originating from diminishing local "food supply" for the mycelium and the second photo shows normal fruiting because of local abundance of cellulose to "consume" by the part of the mycelium present in another compartiment of wood of the same tree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom,

I think the first FB's are either partially a sterile or an anamorph reproductive form (Ceriomyces aurantiacus), mostly originating from diminishing local "food supply" for the mycelium and the second photo shows normal fruiting because of local abundance of cellulose to "consume" by the part of the mycelium present in another compartiment of wood of the same tree.

 

Thanks a lot, never heard of this anamorph form of Laetiporus before. Now found your picture on Soortenbank.nl (use that website a lot as a valuable source of info, too bad for the rest of you that it's in Dutch :001_tt2:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.