Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Dropped kerb planning rejected due to RPA


Gajendra
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

15 hours ago, tree77 said:

Looking at the photo can see why it was refused, based on what we approve/refused within the authority i work with. 

 

Appreciate other houses have crossing close to trees but what would help your case if you have any recent examples to could use

 

 

Unfortunately for me it seems every house on that street installed their dropped kerb well before the legislation got changed.

 

12 hours ago, john87 said:

Can i just say, a local authority CANNOT just set "policies" and decide that is that. They have to decide each case on its merits, Blanket policies are unlawful.. It is called "fettering their discretion" Letter to the council monitoring officer, and if no luck, ombudsman. Not saying the ombudsman casn change the verdict, but what they CAN do, is to make sure your case was considered in the proper manner and not just a blanket "no"

 

john..

Thank you John, I have requested council to send arborist to carry out survey but I think they said there is 6 weeks waiting list just to get an appoint to speak to him. 

 

4 hours ago, Anno said:

Depends on if its Policy or Strategy - it makes a lot of difference, the latter is a long process, usually involving legal process and consultation, in my experience officers usually are overworked and underfunded but do need to give consideration on a one to one basis and try to get a positive outcome for all parties.

*stands well back and waits for the Council/tree officers are just scum posts*

Thanks Anno, I think like John mentioned above it was just blanket approach and no consideration was given. I will have to appeal their decisions but I am not sure what to write on my appeal. I don't think I can just say I don't agree with their policy haha.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have said if you are determined to see this through then its going to be down to you to put in the leg work to prove to the council that installing the drop kerb is not going to cause damage to the trees. I would say that it is extremely unlikely that they will change their decision, just because having a drop kerb will make you life easier. 

 

I think your first step is to employ a professional arboricultural consultant to continue the application on your behalf. Yes this costs money but they are dealing with these sort of applications on a daily basis.

 

The second thing that you/the consultant will need to do is to find a way to prove that by installing a drop kerb there will be no/minimal damage to the trees. To do this they will need to understand where the trees are rooting and the only way to do this is to have a look. Either physical excavation with an airspade or using a ground penetrating radar system. In this situation the airspade is going to be expensive and cause a mountain of paperwork because you need permits to excavate the pavement/road that is owned by the council, it then has to be reinstated by one of their contractors while your application is being processed. A ground penetrating radar or Tree Radar Survey will still not be cheap, however it can be completed without permits or even permission from the council as there is no damage to the roadway.

 

There is still a chance that after all of the above the trees are mostly rooting within that area you want to excavate, and permission is still not granted. However you will at least know for certain rather than guessing. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Arboraeration said:

As others have said if you are determined to see this through then its going to be down to you to put in the leg work to prove to the council that installing the drop kerb is not going to cause damage to the trees. I would say that it is extremely unlikely that they will change their decision, just because having a drop kerb will make you life easier. 

 

I think your first step is to employ a professional arboricultural consultant to continue the application on your behalf. Yes this costs money but they are dealing with these sort of applications on a daily basis.

 

The second thing that you/the consultant will need to do is to find a way to prove that by installing a drop kerb there will be no/minimal damage to the trees. To do this they will need to understand where the trees are rooting and the only way to do this is to have a look. Either physical excavation with an airspade or using a ground penetrating radar system. In this situation the airspade is going to be expensive and cause a mountain of paperwork because you need permits to excavate the pavement/road that is owned by the council, it then has to be reinstated by one of their contractors while your application is being processed. A ground penetrating radar or Tree Radar Survey will still not be cheap, however it can be completed without permits or even permission from the council as there is no damage to the roadway.

 

There is still a chance that after all of the above the trees are mostly rooting within that area you want to excavate, and permission is still not granted. However you will at least know for certain rather than guessing. 

Thank you so much. Any idea what sort of cost we are looking at for this fancy procedures that you have mentioned above? Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh boy, this has been a classic Arbtalk 'the Council are all bastards/idiots' rant so far, but it's slightly missing an obvious point. The Council owns the road, the footway and the trees and doesn't want them wrecked by chancers and amateurs. So it uses industry best practice (BS5837 and NJUG) to prevent damage unless the applicant is willing to pay to prove that there aren't roots to be damaged. Seems fair enough. No different from a planning application being refused because of tree damage. Same standards, same principles. And Councils will accept that trees won't be damaged if an exploratory excavation establishes that there aren't roots present. If they are present, go over them if levels allow. Unfortunately drop kerbs only ever require reduction of levels.

 

Two wrongs don't make a right.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn’t there a thing whereby they are trying to stop people turning their front gardens into drives everywhere?

Cos it ruins the look of neighborhoods and causes more flooding cos of hard standing.

You have to admit that the front of the house with a nice garden looks a lot better than two parked cars up to the front door.

 

Maybe the council are trying to draw a line under this sort of thing.

Edited by Mick Dempsey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought any new access needed to go through planning?? In which case 'lines of sight' may be more of an issue than affecting tree roots. 

Contact the council again for confirmation.

If necessary put your application in. Wait months- find out all reasons for refusal/approval. Get expert in and appeal.. Might take a while...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, daltontrees said:

Oh boy, this has been a classic Arbtalk 'the Council are all bastards/idiots' rant so far, but it's slightly missing an obvious point. The Council owns the road, the footway and the trees and doesn't want them wrecked by chancers and amateurs. So it uses industry best practice (BS5837 and NJUG) to prevent damage unless the applicant is willing to pay to prove that there aren't roots to be damaged. Seems fair enough. No different from a planning application being refused because of tree damage. Same standards, same principles. And Councils will accept that trees won't be damaged if an exploratory excavation establishes that there aren't roots present. If they are present, go over them if levels allow. Unfortunately drop kerbs only ever require reduction of levels.

 

Two wrongs don't make a right.

 

Thanks Juels. I am willing to pay a reasonable amount to carry out the survey to see if there are any roots where I want to build a dropped kerb. But the email I received was sent from council highway department to say my plan has been rejected and email their complaint team if I am not happy. It is crazy who on this planet will be happy with their plan being rejected haha. They have not said anything on what are my options. 

 

3 hours ago, Mick Dempsey said:

Isn’t there a thing whereby they are trying to stop people turning their front gardens into drives everywhere?

Cos it ruins the look of neighborhoods and causes more flooding cos of hard standing.

You have to admit that the front of the house with a nice garden looks a lot better than two parked cars up to the front door.

 

Maybe the council are trying to draw a line under this sort of thing.

Apparently there is a new legislation where you have to build a soakaway in your drive plus you have to build your drive before council builds the dropped kerb. On this street there are 91 houses and 89 of them have dropped kerb which is why I am a little annoyed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.