Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Crown reduction used for root and butt rot


Laura 12345
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I worry this is a silly question, but just wanted to ask exactly why crown reduction is such a common management option for trees experiencing root/ lower stem rot, e.g. caused by Ganoderma species. I'm guessing it is much more than merely reducing the load/sail area? It seems like it is often more about removing potentially hazardous branches from the crown etc (reducing the immediate risk) than optimising the long-term health of the tree, as surely removing all that photosynthetic material and creating numerous wounds doesn't help a pre-stressed tree? 

 

I've googled this many a time to no real avail, so if anyone has any recommendations for further reading that would also be great. 

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Edited by Laura 12345
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

You can’t really manage the long term health of a tree that isn’t healthy. More about risk management and retaining a potentially dangerous tree rather than felling. If I’ve recommended a reduction due to serious decay on a tree I’d normally consider it as a short term solution, or first stage in the trees ultimate removal. Of course every tree, decay, and situation is different so there’s probably many more answers 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to adding to Steve's info reducing weight on the end of long branches takes a lot of stress off the branch. Try holding a 1kg bag of sugar on the end of a polesaw horizontally, the strain (moment) is multiplied along its length (force x distance). Take 10kg off a 5m branch is 50kg less loading.
I also think there is a psychological benefit to all concerned that the tree has been pruned and is now safer as a result. It's generally impossible to know if this kind of pruning does increase safety but it makes everyone feel that way. This also means people are happier to retain the tree and live with the (lessened) risk. The other options are do nothing or removal.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.