Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 0

Help - Removal of trees - heave


Ramo
 Share

Question

Hi everyone, 

 

I am about to exchange on a house, 3 bed semi in NW London. The vendors claimed for subsidence in 2018, whereby the experts on behalf of the insurance company believe it was caused by "byroot exacerbated clay shrinkage subsidence". The property suffered cracks to the rear extension, the rear elevation and to a dividing wall. The pattern of damage indicated downward movement to the rear extension. The level of damage to the property was classified as category 2 in accordance with BRE digest 251. 

 

The remedial works included superstructure repair works, and the removal of a large number of trees to the rear (please see pictures attached). 

 

My buildings surveyor noted that it is usually unadvisable to remove the trees in their entirety given the ground is clay and there is an equilibrium between the trees and the house. He also noted it was a particularly hot summer in 2018 and with the buildings damage being minor, it seems like an extreme measure. 

 

My question to the group (and my concern) is the potential for heave in the upcoming years. Given the trees were only removed approx 18 months ago, would you have concerns in purchasing the house. 

 

Appreciate any advice that you may have. 

Screenshot 2020-08-11 at 17.01.12.png

Screenshot 2020-08-11 at 17.01.40.png

Screenshot 2020-08-11 at 17.01.57.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Ah yes, the OPs situation, and my own, largely fall into that I guess.  Damage that isn't making the house unliveable or in danger of collapse, as annoying as unsightly cracks and stuck doors and windows are. The big stress is knowing that I want to move as the family has outgrown the house, but attitudes to subsidence mean I can't afford to, unless it's fixed.  That then is very stressful.  Were houses not so absurdly expensive, particularly in London and the SE, I guess that wouldn't be such a problem.

 

I think that climate change has created a big problem for insurers and there will be a change needed.  Perhaps subsidence insurance will be a scandal like the PPI one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.