Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Fungal Brackets | Can you accurately age them?


Acer ventura
 Share

Recommended Posts

How old is this fungal bracket?

 

One, two, five years old?

 

I posted some of this in a reply on the Arbcology Facebook page, and thought it might be worth sharing it on here. It’s from an article I’m writing about what appears to be rotten at the roots of the expert evidence the court had to work with in a UK court Judgment known as Cavanagh v Witley Parish Council.

…..

You can't count pore tube layers, like the candles on a birthday cake, to accurately age a fungal bracket. Perennial fungal brackets don't grow like trees that produce an annual ring each year. They often produce a new layer of pore tubes with each growth spurt. This can happen once, twice, maybe several times a year. Some years there's no growth. Other years there's growth but just the darker brown flesh and no pore tube layer. Those of you who may have heard anecdotal evidence that you can age fungal brackets like this, don't take my word for it. We can ask someone who's an internationally renowned mycologist with particular expertise in decay fungi.

“Layers of pores/tubes on perennial brackets of fungi cannot be reliably used to judge age, because there is not necessarily just one new set per year. There could be several, or perhaps even no new pores”

 

Professor Lynne Boddy, Cardiff University

.....

Photo credit - David Humphries

Ganoderma Cross Section.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Interesting concept. Yes how can you age a fungal bracket..

But also that is just the fruiting body. The internal fungi and breakdown could well have been going on a lot longer inside the tree.

How long does the wood take to breakdown and does it depend on white or brown rot.

Lignin or cellulose removal.

Quite a thing to behold.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/08/2020 at 16:53, Acer ventura said:

How old is this fungal bracket?

 

One, two, five years old?

 

I posted some of this in a reply on the Arbcology Facebook page, and thought it might be worth sharing it on here. It’s from an article I’m writing about what appears to be rotten at the roots of the expert evidence the court had to work with in a UK court Judgment known as Cavanagh v Witley Parish Council.

…..

You can't count pore tube layers, like the candles on a birthday cake, to accurately age a fungal bracket. Perennial fungal brackets don't grow like trees that produce an annual ring each year. They often produce a new layer of pore tubes with each growth spurt. This can happen once, twice, maybe several times a year. Some years there's no growth. Other years there's growth but just the darker brown flesh and no pore tube layer. Those of you who may have heard anecdotal evidence that you can age fungal brackets like this, don't take my word for it. We can ask someone who's an internationally renowned mycologist with particular expertise in decay fungi.

“Layers of pores/tubes on perennial brackets of fungi cannot be reliably used to judge age, because there is not necessarily just one new set per year. There could be several, or perhaps even no new pores”

 

Professor Lynne Boddy, Cardiff University

.....

Photo credit - David Humphries

Ganoderma Cross Section.png

Fantastic photo btw David.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Khriss said:

@Acer ventura   close but not the truth.  The tree speaks to me actually ?  my brief reply was too brief.  If the bracket IS visible you have to consider that decay HAS been active , possibly for many years and the implications thereof. K

I don't doubt the decay's been active before it fruited, but why put such an accurate figure on it?  It could've been decades, or a very short time because a volume of wood was rapidly rendered dysfunctional by a pruning event, limb loss, or root severance.

 

As the only way we can comfortably age a fungal bracket, outside of quite a wide range, is to know when it first fruited, there's much more uncertainty about how long the fungus has been at work.  Particularly, as it may have had a long nap during its life.

 

Also, if you take your eyes of the prize, you'll see the fungal bracket's on a log.?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Acer ventura and the follow on to this. Is who is gonna pay  ?  I haven't found a reliable, quick measure of decay that is reproduceable without huge cost. Plus customer will come out with " how long will it last "  and " when will it fail" and the cracker " how much will it cost"   hence my ' ten years plus'  which is probably a better idea than most general public estimates. K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.