Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Clay Soil - Property Foundation Issues - Advice.


JonnyRFT
 Share

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Wolfie said:

So the cracks and annual movement is related to subsidence rather than heave.
I’ve never actually witnessed a case of heave, I think it’s a very rare occurrence.
From reading up on heave, I gather it can only happen when all these factors come into play:
1. Clay soil
2. Tree(s) have to predate the building
3 building has been constructed upon soil which is already water deficient due to the tree roots.

Open to being corrected.
Don’t know how old that building is but Leylandii grow pretty quick.

You are right with regards to trees predating the building. I actually meant that I’m dealing with subsidence but I have not worded my original statement very well. 
 

I think the large cypress at the rear of the property was probably the issue. It was mature specimen removed in the summer months circa 5 years ago according to the occupier. I only have his word to take as verbatim though. But because he mentioned the cracks widening in the summer, that says to me to lapsed conifer hedge is playing a fundamental part in the ground movement.

 

I can probably hazard a guess that the foundation’s are insufficient but without a borehole test I cannot say for sure. That’s at least an option yet it still leaves me in the same situation.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

1 hour ago, tree77 said:

If the customer has building insurance why not let there insurance provider carry out the investigation and then act on their recommendations.

 

 

 

The recommendation is to fell the trees. We have no problem with rectifying the issues but there’s also another property that doesn’t belong to us behind the conifers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, JonnyRFT said:

The recommendation is to fell the trees. We have no problem with rectifying the issues but there’s also another property that doesn’t belong to us behind the conifers.

Was the report carried out by there insurance provider?

If so presumably a trail hole was dug and soil analysis etc undertaken.

 

Depending on what there basing the recommendation for removal on by not doing this could cause other problems.

why not remove the conifers and replace with a fence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.