Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Maybe the UK should plant more....


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Big J said:

We have 30 hectares going in this year on two sites. Approximately 61 hectares on 6 sites next year. 

 

We're being fairly selective on sites, so generally low level, flat or nearly flat sites with euc species chosen according to the site conditions. Mostly nitens though.

Pretty interesting, sorry if I missed it in previous comments but what's it to be grown for? Fuel?

 

I briefly remember reading about a guy with an estate down in England who pretty much pioneered the planting of eucalyptus and it showed you round some of the plantations. It was in forestry journal, don't suppose that was the guy you're doing work for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

15 minutes ago, Phloem said:

Pretty interesting, sorry if I missed it in previous comments but what's it to be grown for? Fuel?

 

I briefly remember reading about a guy with an estate down in England who pretty much pioneered the planting of eucalyptus and it showed you round some of the plantations. It was in forestry journal, don't suppose that was the guy you're doing work for?

Fuelwood, sawlogs later on. Carbon sequestration. 

 

Not sure if it's the same guy. I've seen a couple of reasonably mature euc woodlands down here and lots more new plantations. We're lucky in the South West not to have severe frosts so it's ideal for eucalyptus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. Ed said:

My (Australian) wife reckons eucalypts are Australia’s revenge for the rabbit.  I don’t think Portugal thinks much of them any more ...

Portugal doesn't have our biomass requirements. 

 

We import 80% of our timber, including biomass. KRE in Kent is extensively fueled by euc chip from New Zealand. We just need to grow more of our own. 

 

It's not to say that we don't need farmland, but a lot of farmland is managed to maximise grant funding, rather than production. I don't agree with that. 

 

They are just impressive, and it's quite nice to think that starting out in forestry, you could conceivably see 3 rotations of 120ft trees in your working life.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Big J said:

Portugal doesn't have our biomass requirements. 

 

We import 80% of our timber, including biomass. KRE in Kent is extensively fueled by euc chip from New Zealand. We just need to grow more of our own. 

 

It's not to say that we don't need farmland, but a lot of farmland is managed to maximise grant funding, rather than production. I don't agree with that. 

 

They are just impressive, and it's quite nice to think that starting out in forestry, you could conceivably see 3 rotations of 120ft trees in your working life.

As an outsider in (or at best an incomer to) this world, I'm beginning to realise that the biodiversity and environmental arguments for and against, say, a eucalyptus plantation, should be considered in the context of alternative land uses, which in the situation you're positing is grain or grass - neither of which are notably diverse when done commercially.

 

Gosh, that was clumsily put - forgive me. I'm the Henry James (famous for tortured syntax and yard long sentences) of the tree world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Ed said:

As an outsider in (or at best an incomer to) this world, I'm beginning to realise that the biodiversity and environmental arguments for and against, say, a eucalyptus plantation, should be considered in the context of alternative land uses, which in the situation you're positing is grain or grass - neither of which are notably diverse when done commercially.

 

Gosh, that was clumsily put - forgive me. I'm the Henry James (famous for tortured syntax and yard long sentences) of the tree world.

I'm entirely in favour of unnecessarily obscure and esoteric language, so let me be the first to say welcome!!

 

The way I look at forestry is to compartmentalise. No one woodland will fulfill all criteria. You can't grow biomass effectively in an oak woodland, but it's hard to get high grade framing timber from eucalyptus. Biodiversity is important obviously, but the fields that we're planting are presently either arable or grassland, neither of which are adding much to biodiversity in the area, and I'd argue that even a eucalyptus plantation is an improvement.

 

Fundamentally, we just need more woodland. I'm still in favour of the expansion of ecologically diverse broadleaf woodlands, but that needs to be coupled with fast growing stands that supply our growing timber needs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Big J said:

... that supply our growing timber needs.

The nitens we put in had 1+cm annual growth rings. Scottish/Scandinavian timber is closer ringed so stronger.

So, from our tiny experience, nitens might not be structurally dependable.

Nitens, as a crop, will have other timber product applications as well as fuel despite this.

Something worth considering with the amenity/heritage PoV, UK climate has obviously changed growing conditions.

If the extended dry summers and warm/wet winters continue, then nitens will be one to watch

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Sutton said:

The nitens we put in had 1+cm annual growth rings. Scottish/Scandinavian timber is closer ringed so stronger.

So, from our tiny experience, nitens might not be structurally dependable.

Nitens, as a crop, will have other timber product applications as well as fuel despite this.

Something worth considering with the amenity/heritage PoV, UK climate has obviously changed growing conditions.

If the extended dry summers and warm/wet winters continue, then nitens will be one to watch

The nitens we planted during April has handled the drought really well which is more than can be said for the conifers we've planted. It is indeed a climate change crop.

 

I did quite extensive measurements on a stand of 9.5yr old nitens last year and it had an average dbh of 24cm, height of 22-23m and yield class of 54. It was on good soil, but was fairly exposed and moisture availability could have been better. On one of our sites in particular, we're expecting much more rapid growth. The vertical growth was pretty stunted on this site due to wind exposure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.