Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Engineering solution for wall, being pushed over by tree.


benedmonds
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

9 hours ago, Gimlet said:

I'm a bricklayer by trade and I had a similar job to this about ten years ago on a Victorian brick and flint garden wall. Except my trees were ash. 

 

As others have said you have to span the main roots but in my case I did it with an arch because it was appropriate to the period of the wall. Three arches in fact, one of them curving laterally in an S shape. The highest point of the arches were only about 10" above the ground when it was finished. Building those was straightforward (though constructing the turning piece for the curved one was a headache). The slog was digging out. First you need to expose the roots so you can see what exactly it is you've got to span and then the foundations have to be much deeper than the roots so there's no danger of them getting underneath and causing heave again. Mine went down about five feet. Into flint... It cost a fortune but fortunately the client was well off and liked trees and old Victorian walls.

A couple of roots I cut and sealed with stockholm tar. It was a bit of a stab in the dark (and the only non-toxic sealant I could think of that I had to hand) but it seemed to work. Ten years later there has been no further movement. That's not to say there won't be in the future. With big trees you're buying time rather than making permanent fixes and there are no guarantees. 

 

I think I was also lucky to be building on a chalk and flint substrate because that type of ground structure is very resistant to drought shrinkage which is greatly exacerbated by nearby trees. Trees get you both ways, heave and subsidence. 

If you're on a clay, gravel or sand substrate you'll be lucky to stop future movement unless you can dig through it and find some bedrock to build off.

Interesting and useful experience, thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Khriss said:

Fell the wall - put fence up - done K

I expect there are privacy and conservation area reasons for not doing the fence or railing solution which is in all other respects really the obvious choice. And perceived value of tree to its owners versus costs of solution. Removing the tree won't fix the wall, either, so there's possibly goung to be building work anyyway, and it's the extra cost of work due to retaining the tree that needs to go into the equation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say it is looking through the wrong end of the tube Julian, as long as the tree is sound and has a good life expectancy there , the biodiversity aspect of this aint been served by tree removal or on cost- wall restructuring. as to privacy , I bet client uses WhatsApp............ ;) K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Khriss said:

I would say it is looking through the wrong end of the tube Julian, as long as the tree is sound and has a good life expectancy there , the biodiversity aspect of this aint been served by tree removal or on cost- wall restructuring. as to privacy , I bet client uses WhatsApp............ ;) K

We could bring down the government by getting Trump to project manage the building of the wall...

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If LPA have already consented TPO fell (albeit we don’t have detail of the justification case - tree might be fatally flawed elsewhere?) it might be assumed that they value the CA contribution of a (relatively recent) brick wall, over that of a mature tree - or they simply haven’t joined the dots and thought it through very well. ?

 

Its not a ‘bad’ situation for tree owner to be in - it seems they have options rather than problems. 

 

If they want to keep the tree they can - at a cost. 

 

But they have green light to remove if they need to.

 

There’s always the option to put some / all of the money saved from engineering works towards new planting (enough money to allow for choice, well established tree(s) in alternate location) chosen to allow full life-cycle.

 

Good to see options being explored rather than an automatic default to fell, but sometimes the initial reaction is the initial reaction for a reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just re-read the OP. The brick wall is on an old sandstone footing. That explains the lack orf resistanc eto movement of the wall and the legth of wall affected by the movement. I withdraw my suggestion fo a concrete beam. It's too late for that. It probably needs a lot of wall and footings removed, mini-piles inserted wherever possible between roots and a ground beam cast on top then rebuild wall.

 

The LPA may well be in the compensation zone and the approval may partly be a refelction of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.