Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 0

Copper Beech


njm
 Share

Question

Hi ,

Not my field so advice required  , 10 months ago my new neighbour approached me about trimming my 25 / 30 year old copper beech on there boundary line  i had no issue as it was agreed that it would be done while the tree was dormant in winter ,  said trimming was ok with no issues but 2 weeks ago in the middle of the hot spell they have now taken a second bash at the tree as apparently there garden requires more light for there enjoyment !   as can be seen there are now rather a lot of dead leaves on the trimmed side of the tree , if they continue will this cause permanent damage to my tree and should  the canopy be reduced this winter to try and keep the issue from escalating ?   Thanks in advance 

tree 003.JPG

Edited by njm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
2 minutes ago, stihlmadasever said:

As mick says we see this sort of situation alot.I agree its a crackin tree,in the wrong place though.

I stand by my original recommendation as this tree will just get bigget,cause more neighbourly friction and cost you more money to maintain it in the long run.

Good luck whichever way you decide to go.

But if tree owner is willing to invest as he wants to keep the tree then cant see a problem with that as long as he is aware of the ongoing costs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 0
2 minutes ago, Treeation said:

But if tree owner is willing to invest as he wants to keep the tree then cant see a problem with that as long as he is aware of the ongoing costs 

Ive given my opinion as i see it.

Its not something im going to debate.

No offence intended treeation

Im out

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
57 minutes ago, Treeation said:

Cool, whats would be the reason you think it woud be better out of interest?

Because the tree can better react to wounds while active. In this situation it becomes a bit like a hedge which needs a couple of trims a year. The owner of the adjacent property has the right to remove anything trespassing over the boundary so the tree owner has no say in this. I suspect the tree owner will only have an issue if the "trespass" becomes actionable, by damaging the house, at which stage the costs of abating the nuisance will be down to him.

 

If the adjacent land owner isn't happy to keep trimming then I agree with MickD and stihlmad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
7 minutes ago, openspaceman said:

Because the tree can better react to wounds while active. In this situation it becomes a bit like a hedge which needs a couple of trims a year. The owner of the adjacent property has the right to remove anything trespassing over the boundary so the tree owner has no say in this. I suspect the tree owner will only have an issue if the "trespass" becomes actionable, by damaging the house, at which stage the costs of abating the nuisance will be down to him.

 

If the adjacent land owner isn't happy to keep trimming then I agree with MickD and stihlmad

Thanks everyone for all the advice  .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm no expert - but a road I work in has a big line of copper beech that were pollarded at about the size of yours, possibly bigger and the regrowth is now 4 to 6 inch diameter. Historically beech pollards were common, probably to get firewood. If you did it at Christmas as a kill or cure, you may end up with something you can take back to pollard knuckles at  major forks  by the top of the trunk every 3 years or so, and clear the trunk to suit your taste. Definitely try to initiate a pollard before a fell, such a beautiful colour.  If it was pollarded it may be possible to trim the regrowth after 3 to 5 years as a lollipop shaped beech hedge one tree long, annual trim

may01.thumb.jpg.68e225731a9114d6b892e43d1dd15145.jpg

Beech-Pollards-Epping-Forest.thumb.jpg.586b5591e0a0ada9b2d738b19f0fb467.jpg

Edited by tree-fancier123
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Might be interesting to see a shot from 180° (reverse angle) to gauge the size / scale of the garden within which the tree stands.  

 

If the garden is massive, or at least of sufficient scale to accommodate a large mature tree, then perhaps allowing to grow on to maturity (either with crown lift or pollards as previously suggested, or just left as is) might be the best way to go - although this might not 100% satisfy the neighbour. 

 

If the garden isn't massive, or the mature tree might cause 'issues' in terms of scale / size later, maybe consider reducing it down to form a hedge...??

 

Just floating that out there without seeking to disagree with any other comments - (nothings happened to piss me off yet today so I'm being uncharacteristically 'middle of the road!!')

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.