Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Delaying validation


Gary Prentice
 Share

Recommended Posts

I submitted an app on 7th of July and so, when a letter landed today,  I thought that it had been determined.

 

The letter informs me they've received my application and, subject to it containing sufficient information for validation, I'll get an answer in six to eight weeks!

 

 

I submitted a 211 and an app to another authority, two weeks later I get a letter to say one site is in a CA, the has TPOd trees on it???  Really!

 

After phone calls and emails, they then ask me to send copies because they can't find the originals. 

 

Currently averaging 3-4 months to get an app determined, S211,s over five if at all. Five day notices? I don't think I've even had an acknowledgement for the last three.

 

How much worse is it going to get?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Every council is different,  helps if the TO does his/her own app permissions too.  Its the councils without a TO that prove to be an issue, the ones where someone in planning has an app left on their desk and out come the legal books etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually email to planning admin and cc to the particular office who deals with tree apps.

 

I'll email the authority to remind them the submission date was 7th July (we have a receipt response) and that the determination date is eight weeks from then, not 12th August! I don't want to waste my time going to appeal, for non determination, but will do if they don't play fair. 

 

I've made fuss with different councils for the last ten years, forced a few changes and caused a bit of trouble, but I'm pragmatic now. I recognise the position a lot of departments are in, so as long as there's some give and take I don't bother too much - as long as the client isn't on my case!

 

TO has been great today, I asked Friday for a meeting, met this afternoon and because of the situation he's given consent to do the work tomorrow, if we need to. How do complain if you have to wait a bit longer, to lift someone's tree in a back garden?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, EdwardC said:

If practical I'd do the apps/S211's through the portal. :thumbup1: If not then by post, registered/signed for, maybe e-mail to the relevant department, or the generic email address for the Council. Take them in person to reception and get a receipt when you hand them in. But always have a copy and evidence that it was sent.

 

For apps you could always appeal on the grounds of non-determination. If an S211 then get on with it after the six-weeks notice.

 

Maybe if you make a nuisance and complain/appeal/get on with it they will be more inclined to be prompt.

 

How much worse is it going to get. Well that depends on how long people are prepared to keep voting Tory keeping them in power and so allowing them to impose their dogma of cuts to services based on the grounds of austerity to fund tax cuts for the rich. If the Councils have less and less money to provide services, expect less and less by way of service.:thumbdown:

 

In a few years the pendulum will swing again and public services will be seen as important and will gradually improve. But that's not going to be before all central government funding of local government by way of the Revenue Support Grant is axed. So expect more cuts, lots more cuts, in the next few years.

Everyone needs to embrace behavioural change which delivers more efficient working practice - The Planning Portal (in this instance) is a great example.

 

 Public sector departments are riddled with inefficiency, ineptitude, idleness and lack of imagination - the spotlight is on them and the money tap is off, for that we can THANK "the Tories" and we should live in dread of the prospect of Labour promising to write cheques our bank balances can't cash.

12 hours ago, EdwardC said:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel awful now.

 

Emailed planning this morning to highlight the submission date and I found their response unacceptable in recording the application five weeks later. I said that if the app wasn't determined eight weeks after my submission I'd be going to appeal.

 

the TO replied with a very apologetic email, the response is computer generated and uses the day the operator inputs the details. He'd forgotten to amend to the right dates!

 

He'd also written the consent and although he hadn't got it in the post yet who wanted us to know that we could crack on.

 

I wish I'd sent a lot less officious email and been a lot more friendly in my approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is interesting being on the other side as a TO - I certainly don't condone the incompetence of some council practices which I hear about on here and seen first hand, but as a whole the industry has changed and is changing - along with councils.

 

Councils are so process driven they have lost site of the purpose - PUBLIC SERVICE -  and in trying to be efficient and work in this digital age the role of the TO is wrapped up in the same parcel as a planner/planning process which can cause problems.  For example if you wanted a site meeting with me you now have to make a PreApp request and be charged for it ?!?!  i get accused by my managers of being too helpful and being asked 'should that have been a PreApp?'  Err No I'm here to help and I dont see an us and them were on teh same side; whats the best option for the tree(s).

 

Also colleagues have experienced not being able to fill TO/Tree inspector posts and the reason, in the old days if you were lucky you did the ND in arb  or trained on the job gaining your tickets worked brash dragging then, climbing and decided you could do it better  yourself set up on your own learned more on the jobs etc effectively an apprenticeship and at some point possibly decided that a job with the council seemed a good option on those freezing cold days.  With the development of qualifications within the industry more people are gaining foundation degree, MSCs etc and want to launch into consultancy roles leaving a big gap in the skill base in terms of coming up through the ranks.  I am not criticisng the development of making the industry more professional and recognised qualifications etc but what you are left with in terms of filling TO roles can be questionable.

 

Just the observations of a TO - Happy Friday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking online at the abysmal standard of some of the TPO apps that are validated and processed by my LA, and therefore take up TO / PO time & resource to consult on, I can't help thinking a good chunk of time could be saved by an early rejection of inadequate submissions  rather than letting them progress through the system exhausting resources along the way to the inevitable refusal.  

 

But there in lies some of the problem with most public sector organisations - they need to show "workload" to safeguard jobs / resources so it would be foolish to find ways of reducing loading and become more efficient because that could result in less staff / resource. 

 

Hate to say it, but maybe it IS time that 211/TPO apps were a pay to use service, might result in some better standard submissions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.