Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Too many tree surgeons?!


TimberCutterDartmoor
 Share

Are there too many tree surgeons in the UK?  

239 members have voted

  1. 1. Are there too many tree surgeons in the UK?

    • Far too many; so much competition I can barely survive!
      100
    • Not too many but don't need any more!
      116
    • Could do with a few more to be honest!
      12
    • Nowhere near enough. So much wood and so little expertise!
      11


Recommended Posts

Everyone’s at it round here lopping n topping and thrashing around. It does have its lighter moments though, as I saw this afternoon an unfamiliar tranny with greedy boards on my patch,with several swarthy types trying to look busy.Closer inspection revealed one guy standing on a wallpaper hangers steps pruning a Curly willow roadside with a long reach hedgecutter, while another fellow was laying on top of a high close clipped Connie hedge reaching down vertically with his hs45 about to break his neck at any moment onto the pavement 15 feet below. I gave them a cheery wave as I pulled my tranny away but was blanked by the entire happy band.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert


I wouldn’t know about that I cut grass for a living!
I’m sure you are right but it’s not the point. You can’t change what others do or charge so do your own thing and leave them to it


We are professional arborists, a surveyor in my case, therefore our prerogative is expert advise relating to the health of the tree and the survival of the organism for future generations. Besides the trees and eventually the area becoming unsightly due to half arse tree surgeons topping everything this form of butchery will start taking its toll on the tree count in the area due to pests and diseases. Some species will come out the other side but many won't, trees are not meant to be topped, they're not meant to be pruned either but they do have a better chance of dealing with a pruning than a topping. It's this sort of attitude that still relegates this industry to the gutter, I'm a conservationist and I understand it is my job to preserve these long lived giants for my children and they're children, it's not just about making a quick buck.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



We are professional arborists, a surveyor in my case, therefore our prerogative is expert advise relating to the health of the tree and the survival of the organism for future generations. Besides the trees and eventually the area becoming unsightly due to half arse tree surgeons topping everything this form of butchery will start taking its toll on the tree count in the area due to pests and diseases. Some species will come out the other side but many won't, trees are not meant to be topped, they're not meant to be pruned either but they do have a better chance of dealing with a pruning than a topping. It's this sort of attitude that still relegates this industry to the gutter, I'm a conservationist and I understand it is my job to preserve these long lived giants for my children and they're children, it's not just about making a quick buck.



All that’s lovely and true no doubt.

I wonder how many trees it saves though?

Some people will decide that they want THEIR tree topping if that option were took off the table how many will get removed instead?

No doubt if they ring the right person they may be pushed in the right direction but they may not ring the right person and even if they do they might still want it topped no matter what is said to them.

On my very basic understanding of it unless it has a tpo or in a conservation area there is nothing to stop this happening?
Link to comment
Share on other sites




All that’s lovely and true no doubt.

I wonder how many trees it saves though?

Some people will decide that they want THEIR tree topping if that option were took off the table how many will get removed instead?

No doubt if they ring the right person they may be pushed in the right direction but they may not ring the right person and even if they do they might still want it topped no matter what is said to them.

On my very basic understanding of it unless it has a tpo or in a conservation area there is nothing to stop this happening?


Topping a tree is not an option unless it's had it and you are just trying to prolong its life by reducing weight. If the client wants a tree reduced then you reduce the tree according to BS3998, you do not top it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



We are professional arborists, a surveyor in my case, therefore our prerogative is expert advise relating to the health of the tree and the survival of the organism for future generations. Besides the trees and eventually the area becoming unsightly due to half arse tree surgeons topping everything this form of butchery will start taking its toll on the tree count in the area due to pests and diseases. Some species will come out the other side but many won't, trees are not meant to be topped, they're not meant to be pruned either but they do have a better chance of dealing with a pruning than a topping. It's this sort of attitude that still relegates this industry to the gutter, I'm a conservationist and I understand it is my job to preserve these long lived giants for my children and they're children, it's not just about making a quick buck.


Not disagreeing with what you say, advocating bad practice or condoning the butchering of trees.
I don’t think there are many tree care firms, even decent “3998” ones that can earn money without starting a saw up, and only doing conservation work.
Personally, I will always try and sell the customer a crown thin rather than a reduction and if explained properly it is encouraging to find that more often than not they will take the advice.
[emoji106]
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Not disagreeing with what you say, advocating bad practice or condoning the butchering of trees.
I don’t think there are many tree care firms, even decent “3998” ones that can earn money without starting a saw up, and only doing conservation work.
Personally, I will always try and sell the customer a crown thin rather than a reduction and if explained properly it is encouraging to find that more often than not they will take the advice.
[emoji106]


I'm not against pruning of trees, or thinning or reducing of them for that matter. I'm against the removal of large healthy trees unless there's a very good reason and the topping of trees advertised as a reduction. When we crown lift or reduce a tree we've done work on it to prevent its removal, that to me is conservation work in an urban environment.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.