Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Do I need to do a survey?


T.C
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have a very good client (estate) that have given me over the years quite a lot of work. I survey trees as well as do the practical stuff. I was wondering whether they have shown enough 'duty of care' to their trees by getting me in to do work on any suspect stuff but not having that paperwork work of a survey. I don't want them to commission a survey if they don't need one. Basically in the eyes of the courts if the worst should happen have they done enough without the report!

 

Cheers as always

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

This won't answer your specific question directly but its worth having a look at the examples for tree/land owners in the National Tree Safety Groups 'Common sense risk management of trees'

 

Chapter 3 talks about what the law says and Chapter 5 looks at how the guidance can be applied in terms of different levels of tree/land ownership with regard to responsibilities/duty of care.

 

 

full document....

 

http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/FCMS024.pdf/$FILE/FCMS024.pdf

 

abridged version.....

 

http://www.forestry.gov.uk/safetreemanagement

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would seem that the courts are greatly assured when a landowner has a 'system' in place. If it is not documented, it is not damning, but it certainly makes the proof of 'care' easier. If as you say you have dealt with all the suspect stuff, firstly the likelihood of someone getting harmed is reduced and secondly the landowner clearly does toake a responsible approach.

 

What isn't clear is whether it is you or it is the landowner that spots the 'suspect stuff', and whether this is spotted during a systematic inspection or is just noticed in passing. The relevance is that the courts have differentiated between the degree of care required of a landowner in looking for suspect trees and the that required of someone called in by the owner to follow up its suspicions. If you are in any way involved in avising what work needs done rather than just being a contractor, you may have a wider 'duty to warn' if you spot anything that you are suspicious of. So be careful.

 

For similar reasons you need to be careful about putting or finding yourself in the position of advising the landowner how to dioscharge his duty of care. That you have asked the question here indicates you parhaps don't have a full enough understanding of the extent of the duty of care to be taking on the advisory role. But to your credit you quote rightly don't want to put the client to the expense of what might be an unnecessary survey.

 

David Humhries has commended the NTSG publications to you, which is a very good starting point and possibly all that you an the landowner should need to make sure the 'system' is adequate. But probably best if the last word on that decision comes from the landowner. It sounds like you're both close to it already, just neding to clarify the roles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a tool for generating work but a consideration for you. If your landowners tree damaged property or injured a person/animal then can they show an auditable trail whereby reasonable steps have been made to ensure that the risk has been reduced/removed. That may include you walking the estate and merely signing a form to say you have made an inspection.

 

Occupiers’ Liabilities Act 1957 and 1984

An occupier of premises owes the same duty, the “common duty of care”, to all his visitors whether by invite or otherwise. The common duty of care is a duty to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that the ‘visitor’ will be reasonably safe in using the premises for the purposes for which he is invited or permitted by the occupier to be there or for purposes other than that which they have been invited (trespassers).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would seem that the courts are greatly assured when a landowner has a 'system' in place. If it is not documented, it is not damning, but it certainly makes the proof of 'care' easier. If as you say you have dealt with all the suspect stuff, firstly the likelihood of someone getting harmed is reduced and secondly the landowner clearly does toake a responsible approach.

 

What isn't clear is whether it is you or it is the landowner that spots the 'suspect stuff', and whether this is spotted during a systematic inspection or is just noticed in passing. The relevance is that the courts have differentiated between the degree of care required of a landowner in looking for suspect trees and the that required of someone called in by the owner to follow up its suspicions. If you are in any way involved in avising what work needs done rather than just being a contractor, you may have a wider 'duty to warn' if you spot anything that you are suspicious of. So be careful.

 

For similar reasons you need to be careful about putting or finding yourself in the position of advising the landowner how to dioscharge his duty of care. That you have asked the question here indicates you parhaps don't have a full enough understanding of the extent of the duty of care to be taking on the advisory role. But to your credit you quote rightly don't want to put the client to the expense of what might be an unnecessary survey.

 

David Humhries has commended the NTSG publications to you, which is a very good starting point and possibly all that you an the landowner should need to make sure the 'system' is adequate. But probably best if the last word on that decision comes from the landowner. It sounds like you're both close to it already, just neding to clarify the roles.

 

 

 

Good answer :thumbup1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.