Welcome to the Arbtalk.co.uk | Discussion Forum for Arborists.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.


General chat Discuss every day issues in the tree care industry. If you're unsure where to post your topic please choose this forum.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-09-07   #1 (permalink)
Raffle Sponsor 2007, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2013
 
Lee Winger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Downunder
Posts: 5,220
Method statements and on site risk assesments

Does anyone have an example they can show us, I will post an example of both tomorrow..

Can anyone tell me what the difference between the two are? imo they both seem to be the same thing, or at least Ifeel i'm going over the same BS....
__________________
www.arboraeration.co.uk soil decompaction and plant health care specialists. Nationwide coverage.
Lee Winger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-07   #2 (permalink)
Raffle Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,582

Not the same thing at all.
A method statement is a written down way of saying exactly what tasks you are undertaking, and how you will go about doing them
A risk assesment analyses the risks involved, and lays aout how you will mitigate or reduce those risks.

My Method statements tend to be written individually for each contract, whereas my risk assesments are usually generic tick boxes.
Mr Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-07   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
madmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Leics
Posts: 1,120

The Method statement as I understand it describe how you are going to carry out the work to be done.

The risk Assesment lists the risks and their severity , control measures and and wether or not its safe to continue.

Thats my understanding of them, but I wait to be corrected
madmatt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-07   #4 (permalink)
Raffle Sponsor 2007, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2013
 
Lee Winger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Downunder
Posts: 5,220

I agree, both are different to a degree, but surely they could be combined, imo you're spending valuable time going over and over the same stuff ie hazards, control etc etc

Method statements i agree are documents relating to how you plan on undertaking a job , but you should still include risks and control..

Here are some examples of HSE risk assesments, if you have more than 3 brain cells you may well cry lol..

http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/casestudi...ricklayers.pdf
__________________
www.arboraeration.co.uk soil decompaction and plant health care specialists. Nationwide coverage.
Lee Winger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-09-07   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
A_lopa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 624

Ive worked for the largest tree co in Aus and they had both narrowed down to a one page tick box and add names...
A_lopa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-07   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Alex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 194

If Risk Assement confuduls you the AA have the best packge with CD rom and full proforma sheets to work from. They also do a good one day cousre with a LANTRA cert. For a risk assement that is tailor made to fit you and your bussiness you need to empoly some one... ummm I wound who ;-)
__________________
voom "what was that?" "that was your life mate." "oh do I get anouther one?" "No that's your lote mate." "what sorry?" back to the world of dreams....

Life's good... so don't waist it.
Alex is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-07   #7 (permalink)
Raffle Sponsor 2007, 2008
 
bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: edge of the Pennines
Posts: 693

does anyone have a good risk ass form available for download? or am i in fantasy land?
bill is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-07   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
nuttyarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Guildford
Posts: 78

You can have two types of risk assessment- generic and on-site specific.
An example of a generic would be say; Felling a Medium Tree (specific to a task). You would then grade the risk on a scale (tree falling on by-stander, etc.), work out the control measures (adequate training- CS32, etc.) and then work out whether the control measures reduce the risk enough.
The on-site specific would be more like the method statement- what are the local hazards- road bordering site or slippery terrain, etc. and how to deal with these risks- the method statement part.
nuttyarb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Find tree care advice

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0