Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Survival technique?


kevinjohnsonmbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'll post a vid from laptop tomorrow, for some reason (probably me being a dullard) I can't do it from iPhone.

 

Mature Monterey pine shed a large lower limb into a field yesterday, I went to assess this evening (23hrs after failure), whilst close by having a conversation with landowner there were loud cracking noises which were so noticeable as to make me thing the limb was moving. It wasn't, it was the noise of the cones on the broken limb splitting open. It was a bright sunny day and the remainder of the (upright) tree was exposed to equal sunlight. So why were the pine cones on the broken limb literally exploding open whereas the remainder were latent? Is this a survival technique? Was the impact of the fall a trigger to cause the cones to open and reproduce? Has anyone else seen/experienced this? If anyone is interested I'll post the vid! It's difficult to express the starkness of the contrast between the cones on the upright tree and those on the broken limb. One set literally exploding in front of my eyes, the other doing noting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

seperated from the vascular system the limb used all its water rapidly in the heat, simples.

 

It would have drained EVERY drop from every cell in doing so, trying to maintain function

 

 

That makes absolute sense! Thank you. It wasn't totally severed, but your logic still applies. ImageUploadedByArbtalk1406066965.886810.jpg.53537172fc37fed66708393147fd6cf4.jpg

 

(PS, I also like your "rock the system" themed posts in other threads)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seperated from the vascular system the limb used all its water rapidly in the heat, simples.

 

It would have drained EVERY drop from every cell in doing so, trying to maintain function

 

 

Pondered this since last night and checked a basket of cones I picked from the ground last Nov from same group of trees. Whilst some in the basket are partially opened, some fully open and some remain closed (approx ⅓ each) it seemed all the cones on the fallen limb were wide open (or progressing rapidly towards that state). So if it is solely the removal of vascular function I would expect the fallen cones to have opened in the same fashion. It's just an observation that I wanted to share to see if any of the learned tree biologists had a view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pondered this since last night and checked a basket of cones I picked from the ground last Nov from same group of trees. Whilst some in the basket are partially opened, some fully open and some remain closed (approx ⅓ each) it seemed all the cones on the fallen limb were wide open (or progressing rapidly towards that state). So if it is solely the removal of vascular function I would expect the fallen cones to have opened in the same fashion. It's just an observation that I wanted to share to see if any of the learned tree biologists had a view.

 

The ones still attached to the branch would have been connected to the rest of the tree's vascular system and therefore dried out with it (ie completely and quickly). Fallen ones are sealed off so dry much slower?

 

Just my guess mind, not learned or a biologist or nuffink.:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ones still attached to the branch would have been connected to the rest of the tree's vascular system and therefore dried out with it (ie completely and quickly). Fallen ones are sealed off so dry much slower?

 

 

 

Just my guess mind, not learned or a biologist or nuffink.:001_smile:

 

 

Liking that logic! Makes sense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ones still attached to the branch would have been connected to the rest of the tree's vascular system and therefore dried out with it (ie completely and quickly). Fallen ones are sealed off so dry much slower?

 

 

 

Just my guess mind, not learned or a biologist or nuffink.:001_smile:

 

 

No, because the limb was still attached, the vascular system would have still been feeding from the roots, unless the tree has drained the moisture from unnecessary places to aid in the secretion of resin to seal the wound

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Arbtalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.