Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Discovery 3 - any experiences?


Tom at Heartwood
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for a comfortable and rugged 4x4 with 5 seats that will tow 3.5t without strain. I aim to work locally but still seem to end up spending a lot of time travelling to sites. I've looked at the various current double cab pick-ups that are rated to tow 3.5t but have my concerns about whether any of them are heavy and tough enough although fuel consumption is appealing. I like Land Cruiser Amazons and you get a lot for the money but fuel consumption is off-putting (and I'm a fan of Overlander Stan's imports as well).

 

It occurs to me that a Discovery 3 might suit my needs. Plenty of vehicle weight, powerful TDV6 engine and well regarded for regular towing as well as being comfortable for longer journeys. Fuel consumption averaging 30mpg (not towing), plenty around and probably as much useful space in the back as a double cab pick-up plus scope for a very big roof rack. The disadvantages seem to be electrical, parking brake and exhaust gas recirculation niggles so it would make sense to go for a basic model to reduce the number of things that can go wrong. I guess that they are a fairly complex vehicle with a new price tag to match so repair costs could be high.

 

I guess I would be looking for an unabused 2005/06 with 80k on the clock for around £7K.

 

It would mean a change in work style for me as I currently run a 1993 Iveco Turbo Daily 4x4 (which I'm very attached and would keep for local jobs) that accommodates tools, tool boxes, many different tubs of fuel and oil, swing lift, Jo Beau, bulk bags, logs, climbing kits etc. There just doesn't seem to be anything more modern and reasonably priced to match that has rugged 4WD, 3.5t towing capacity and all the room inside but some drawers and boxes and a good roof rack on a Disco would hold a lot.

 

Anyway, your thoughts and experiences of Disco 3 for forestry and arb would be appreciated.

 

Cheers,

 

Tom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm looking for a comfortable and rugged 4x4 with 5 seats that will tow 3.5t without strain. I aim to work locally but still seem to end up spending a lot of time travelling to sites. I've looked at the various current double cab pick-ups that are rated to tow 3.5t but have my concerns about whether any of them are heavy and tough enough although fuel consumption is appealing. I like Land Cruiser Amazons and you get a lot for the money but fuel consumption is off-putting (and I'm a fan of Overlander Stan's imports as well).

 

 

 

It occurs to me that a Discovery 3 might suit my needs. Plenty of vehicle weight, powerful TDV6 engine and well regarded for regular towing as well as being comfortable for longer journeys. Fuel consumption averaging 30mpg (not towing), plenty around and probably as much useful space in the back as a double cab pick-up plus scope for a very big roof rack. The disadvantages seem to be electrical, parking brake and exhaust gas recirculation niggles so it would make sense to go for a basic model to reduce the number of things that can go wrong. I guess that they are a fairly complex vehicle with a new price tag to match so repair costs could be high.

 

 

 

I guess I would be looking for an unabused 2005/06 with 80k on the clock for around £7K.

 

 

 

It would mean a change in work style for me as I currently run a 1993 Iveco Turbo Daily 4x4 (which I'm very attached and would keep for local jobs) that accommodates tools, tool boxes, many different tubs of fuel and oil, swing lift, Jo Beau, bulk bags, logs, climbing kits etc. There just doesn't seem to be anything more modern and reasonably priced to match that has rugged 4WD, 3.5t towing capacity and all the room inside but some drawers and boxes and a good roof rack on a Disco would hold a lot.

 

 

 

Anyway, your thoughts and experiences of Disco 3 for forestry and arb would be appreciated.

 

 

 

Cheers,

 

 

 

Tom.

 

 

Be very careful, we have Three of these & you need a large pot of money to keep them running. I have spoke to people that have them & have been lucky but we have not. Three engines, both autos have had gearboxes & torque converters, fuel pump, air flow meters, reversing sensors, compressor, cross over valves, suspension linkages & bushes are annual replacements, injectors, discs & pads, alternator just to mention a few.

 

This is the 2.7 Jaguar engine, I believe the Disco 4 is a lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ignore the above! Body doesn't have to come off to do belts etc

 

I've had 4 of them all commercials and they are fine. Every motor gets a failure. Get a later model one.

 

They make jap crap look like toys, and are effortless at towing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking for a comfortable and rugged 4x4 with 5 seats that will tow 3.5t without strain. I aim to work locally but still seem to end up spending a lot of time travelling to sites. I've looked at the various current double cab pick-ups that are rated to tow 3.5t but have my concerns about whether any of them are heavy and tough enough although fuel consumption is appealing. I like Land Cruiser Amazons and you get a lot for the money but fuel consumption is off-putting (and I'm a fan of Overlander Stan's imports as well).

 

It occurs to me that a Discovery 3 might suit my needs. Plenty of vehicle weight, powerful TDV6 engine and well regarded for regular towing as well as being comfortable for longer journeys. Fuel consumption averaging 30mpg (not towing), plenty around and probably as much useful space in the back as a double cab pick-up plus scope for a very big roof rack. The disadvantages seem to be electrical, parking brake and exhaust gas recirculation niggles so it would make sense to go for a basic model to reduce the number of things that can go wrong. I guess that they are a fairly complex vehicle with a new price tag to match so repair costs could be high.

 

I guess I would be looking for an unabused 2005/06 with 80k on the clock for around £7K.

 

It would mean a change in work style for me as I currently run a 1993 Iveco Turbo Daily 4x4 (which I'm very attached and would keep for local jobs) that accommodates tools, tool boxes, many different tubs of fuel and oil, swing lift, Jo Beau, bulk bags, logs, climbing kits etc. There just doesn't seem to be anything more modern and reasonably priced to match that has rugged 4WD, 3.5t towing capacity and all the room inside but some drawers and boxes and a good roof rack on a Disco would hold a lot.

 

Anyway, your thoughts and experiences of Disco 3 for forestry and arb would be appreciated.

 

Cheers,

 

Tom.

 

Beautiful trucks, great to drive and tow with.

 

I have highlighted in red where you may be mis-informed.

 

If you are going have one may as well get the XS for the cruise control, heated seats and screen etc. These don't go wrong anyway.

 

As Dean has already mentioned. The average bill for repairs will be quite different to your current truck.

 

If I was to have another Disco it would be less than a year old, run it till the warranty ends and sell it. Not worth the trouble or time off the road if it's your only vehicle.

 

On a side not you can get the same year Range Rover 4.4 petrol (no lpg kit) for similar money but it will be much tidier and have all the toys already. I wouldn't worry about the fuel consumption anyway. The repairs on either will outweigh a few quid you might save on fuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quite a few disco's out there with over 200k on the clock. used by the fake police wombles on the motorways.

 

The only real difference on the old base models was no air suspension which is just crap. they still have EGR/park brake etc

 

I use local garage to service and do routine stuff and no more expensive than the audi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just parted with my 56 plate disco, it was a fantastic car, I really miss it. Mine had done 130'000 miles and the auto box was starting to go, could have had it reconditioned for about £1k with 12month waranty, but was warned that the turbo would probably go next, body off job, £2k+, and then the engine would probably blow.

 

I've replaced it with a Landcruser Amazon can't say I've noticed it using much more fuel than the disco, although I never got more than about 22mpg from the disco. The Amazon is nice, but I preferred the disco, it was a great motor to drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sold a four year old disco four about a year ago. With out doubt one of the best 4x4 to drive but built from junk a complete disaster had nine discos over 20"years won't touch another LR product now. I love the old discos can't believe how bad the ford effort was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.